Kaleb Nation

And he said, but you do not have, in my opinion, the ethical mandate, ethical grounds for a mandate for a new vaccine. It isn't here in the bioethics. Immediately put on leave and then a year later dismissed. And this is this this I don't know. Let me ask Pete, to me these phenomenon were so astonishing, like I said, now maybe I believe the earth is flat, I don't know.

And he said, but you do not have, in my opinion, the ethical mandate, ethical grounds for a mandate for a new vaccine. It isn't here in the bioethics. Immediately put on leave and then a year later dismissed. And this is this this I don't know. Let me ask Pete, to me these phenomenon were so astonishing, like I said, now maybe I believe the earth is flat, I don't know.

But the fact that the First Amendment came under attack the way it did, the fact that people are still defending crushing people's First Amendment privilege under the name of their idea of what good information is. I mean, I keep saying this. I've said it a million times. Whose side do you want to be on, the side of Galileo or the Spanish Inquisition?

But the fact that the First Amendment came under attack the way it did, the fact that people are still defending crushing people's First Amendment privilege under the name of their idea of what good information is. I mean, I keep saying this. I've said it a million times. Whose side do you want to be on, the side of Galileo or the Spanish Inquisition?

The Spanish Inquisition had very good standing to get that man to shut up. He would have changed everything. And they didn't say he was wrong. They just needed him to shut up. Whose side do you want to be on, guys? But the First Amendment, I thought, was... protected. But I guess, Pete, it's not.

The Spanish Inquisition had very good standing to get that man to shut up. He would have changed everything. And they didn't say he was wrong. They just needed him to shut up. Whose side do you want to be on, guys? But the First Amendment, I thought, was... protected. But I guess, Pete, it's not.

It's just so astonishing to me that we did this and that the government felt they should or could do this and that people went along with it. Allison, what's the plan going forward? Is your show continuing to focus on people that were canceled? And how do you imagine addressing this going forward?

It's just so astonishing to me that we did this and that the government felt they should or could do this and that people went along with it. Allison, what's the plan going forward? Is your show continuing to focus on people that were canceled? And how do you imagine addressing this going forward?

And as someone who now, Allison, you were trained as a psychologist, you understand the science requires discourse to ascend to something that approximates the truth. What's next for you? What's the direction you're taking things?

And as someone who now, Allison, you were trained as a psychologist, you understand the science requires discourse to ascend to something that approximates the truth. What's next for you? What's the direction you're taking things?

Yeah, and in the middle of a big federal case. But Pete, Allison used another word that, again, she used words that make the hair stand up in the back of my neck. And the word platforming is a word that drives me insane. Is there a way that we can craft a legal response to people accused of platforming people.

Yeah, and in the middle of a big federal case. But Pete, Allison used another word that, again, she used words that make the hair stand up in the back of my neck. And the word platforming is a word that drives me insane. Is there a way that we can craft a legal response to people accused of platforming people.

Just to me, the accusation that you platform somebody is infringing, or at least suggest an intent to infringe on a First Amendment privilege. The same thing with disinformation and misinformation, but platforming in particular is a word that I find most egregious because it is invented out of whole cloth. It came into being three years ago, it did not exist before that.

Just to me, the accusation that you platform somebody is infringing, or at least suggest an intent to infringe on a First Amendment privilege. The same thing with disinformation and misinformation, but platforming in particular is a word that I find most egregious because it is invented out of whole cloth. It came into being three years ago, it did not exist before that.

And it clearly was used as a cudgel to get people's First Amendment rights dragged away from them. Can we go at that term and really, when people use it, use it the way we think of libel and other sorts of attacks? That word is an attack.

And it clearly was used as a cudgel to get people's First Amendment rights dragged away from them. Can we go at that term and really, when people use it, use it the way we think of libel and other sorts of attacks? That word is an attack.

But it's exactly what the founding fathers set up the system to prevent. Precisely what they were thinking about, amazingly, that they were able to project this far into the future. But Pete, I want to finish up with Allison, but I'll give you last thoughts right here and tell us if you want to direct people to the Silent Majority Foundation, let us know here.

But it's exactly what the founding fathers set up the system to prevent. Precisely what they were thinking about, amazingly, that they were able to project this far into the future. But Pete, I want to finish up with Allison, but I'll give you last thoughts right here and tell us if you want to direct people to the Silent Majority Foundation, let us know here.

Well, Pete, we appreciate you doing the work, and please keep us posted. We'll bring you back as things progress. Thank you so much.

Well, Pete, we appreciate you doing the work, and please keep us posted. We'll bring you back as things progress. Thank you so much.