Keith Rabois

No, but like just as we were taping, there's just a whole deluge of economic data that came out.

The GDP print for Q1 came in at minus 0.5%.

I mean, so how could anybody interpret for Q1?

So how could anybody at the Fed or in the media covering the Fed interpret

not understand that, by the way, we were talking about this, just like I said, that we're probably going to print like a three handle on GDP in Q2.

We also talked about the fact that we were probably going to have a negative GDP print in Q1.

So we've been knowing it for months, we've basically been calling it right.

So why is there an inability to just look at the data and just say the obvious, truthful thing?

So whatever you think of Trump, it doesn't really matter.

Rates should not be where they are today.

They should be 50 to 100 basis points lower, period.

It's categorical.

It's obvious.

There's no logical explanation for it.

There is a subjective explanation, and that's political.

Is there a polymarket on who replaces Powell?

Nick, is there anything in there about who replaces Powell?

He's going to announce it.

It's obviously going to be Besant.

Who is the most likely new Fed chair or something like that?