Kelsey Piper

So Grok has a couple of features that I actually think are great and I'm excited to see other AI companies imitate. One thing that people were originally excited about AIs was what if they could in a neutral way that was not government-imposed and not just about what the most popular view was,

sort of answer like false information in a way that's persuasive to people who are maybe skeptical of the mainstream media or whatever. And I think one of the hopes with Grok was that it would do that.

sort of answer like false information in a way that's persuasive to people who are maybe skeptical of the mainstream media or whatever. And I think one of the hopes with Grok was that it would do that.

sort of answer like false information in a way that's persuasive to people who are maybe skeptical of the mainstream media or whatever. And I think one of the hopes with Grok was that it would do that.

So I think Grok's batting average would look really good. That's because a lot of the questions that Grok gets asked are, in fact, very straightforward questions. What's the text of this law? What is this thing that's like settled science? Grok is going to get those right.

So I think Grok's batting average would look really good. That's because a lot of the questions that Grok gets asked are, in fact, very straightforward questions. What's the text of this law? What is this thing that's like settled science? Grok is going to get those right.

So I think Grok's batting average would look really good. That's because a lot of the questions that Grok gets asked are, in fact, very straightforward questions. What's the text of this law? What is this thing that's like settled science? Grok is going to get those right.

It's more interesting in cases where something is actually disputed or in cases where the answer you would find on the first page of Google searches isn't the right answer. I don't think Grok tends to perform well on those. But again, all of these AI models are way better at what they do than they were a year ago.

It's more interesting in cases where something is actually disputed or in cases where the answer you would find on the first page of Google searches isn't the right answer. I don't think Grok tends to perform well on those. But again, all of these AI models are way better at what they do than they were a year ago.

It's more interesting in cases where something is actually disputed or in cases where the answer you would find on the first page of Google searches isn't the right answer. I don't think Grok tends to perform well on those. But again, all of these AI models are way better at what they do than they were a year ago.

So whenever we have these conversations, I do try and look a little forward and ask myself, if we have this conversation same time next year, what will we be talking about? And getting better at answering questions accurately is something that we've seen and I think we'll continue to see.

So whenever we have these conversations, I do try and look a little forward and ask myself, if we have this conversation same time next year, what will we be talking about? And getting better at answering questions accurately is something that we've seen and I think we'll continue to see.

So whenever we have these conversations, I do try and look a little forward and ask myself, if we have this conversation same time next year, what will we be talking about? And getting better at answering questions accurately is something that we've seen and I think we'll continue to see.

So I would bet pretty confidently that Grok in a year will have a better batting average, unless it is deliberately manipulated by Elon to lie in favor of his biases.

So I would bet pretty confidently that Grok in a year will have a better batting average, unless it is deliberately manipulated by Elon to lie in favor of his biases.

So I would bet pretty confidently that Grok in a year will have a better batting average, unless it is deliberately manipulated by Elon to lie in favor of his biases.

One thing I do sort of out of morbid curiosity is I invite all the AIs to look at my document of notes and then write the future perfect newsletter for me. Of course, I would never, I never publish that version, but I'm curious, like, are they capable of it? You know, am I soon to be obviated? And they are not capable of it. But Gemini comes the closest.

One thing I do sort of out of morbid curiosity is I invite all the AIs to look at my document of notes and then write the future perfect newsletter for me. Of course, I would never, I never publish that version, but I'm curious, like, are they capable of it? You know, am I soon to be obviated? And they are not capable of it. But Gemini comes the closest.

One thing I do sort of out of morbid curiosity is I invite all the AIs to look at my document of notes and then write the future perfect newsletter for me. Of course, I would never, I never publish that version, but I'm curious, like, are they capable of it? You know, am I soon to be obviated? And they are not capable of it. But Gemini comes the closest.

But almost nobody uses Gemini in the AI studio chat window. Most people see Google's AI either in Google search results, which is a cheaper to run model, or they see integrations being offered to them in eight different products where they don't necessarily want an integration. I'm perfectly happy to write my own emails.