Kelsey Piper

Yeah, so from the beginning, the companies that are raising billions of dollars to train these AIs have said that their goal is superintelligence that can surpass humans at every task, take all economically valuable work, and sort of compress a century of inventions and developments and technology into a very short time, like a matter of years.

Yeah, so from the beginning, the companies that are raising billions of dollars to train these AIs have said that their goal is superintelligence that can surpass humans at every task, take all economically valuable work, and sort of compress a century of inventions and developments and technology into a very short time, like a matter of years.

Yeah, so from the beginning, the companies that are raising billions of dollars to train these AIs have said that their goal is superintelligence that can surpass humans at every task, take all economically valuable work, and sort of compress a century of inventions and developments and technology into a very short time, like a matter of years.

And I don't think we've seen from these companies the sort of stable, careful, thoughtful track record where we should be excited about that. I think we should be pretty worried about what might happen if they were to pull that off.

And I don't think we've seen from these companies the sort of stable, careful, thoughtful track record where we should be excited about that. I think we should be pretty worried about what might happen if they were to pull that off.

And I don't think we've seen from these companies the sort of stable, careful, thoughtful track record where we should be excited about that. I think we should be pretty worried about what might happen if they were to pull that off.

There are a lot of them. So X has Grok. Google has Gemini. OpenAI has ChatGPT, which sort of started the whole thing. Anthropic has Claude. China's DeepSeek is an app that has an AI you can talk to. And that's not even a full survey of all of them, but those are the ones that I sort of use regularly, the ones that are at the frontier of what it's possible to do.

There are a lot of them. So X has Grok. Google has Gemini. OpenAI has ChatGPT, which sort of started the whole thing. Anthropic has Claude. China's DeepSeek is an app that has an AI you can talk to. And that's not even a full survey of all of them, but those are the ones that I sort of use regularly, the ones that are at the frontier of what it's possible to do.

There are a lot of them. So X has Grok. Google has Gemini. OpenAI has ChatGPT, which sort of started the whole thing. Anthropic has Claude. China's DeepSeek is an app that has an AI you can talk to. And that's not even a full survey of all of them, but those are the ones that I sort of use regularly, the ones that are at the frontier of what it's possible to do.

So Grok has a couple of features that I actually think are great and I'm excited to see other AI companies imitate. One thing that people were originally excited about AIs was what if they could in a neutral way that was not government-imposed and not just about what the most popular view was,

So Grok has a couple of features that I actually think are great and I'm excited to see other AI companies imitate. One thing that people were originally excited about AIs was what if they could in a neutral way that was not government-imposed and not just about what the most popular view was,

So Grok has a couple of features that I actually think are great and I'm excited to see other AI companies imitate. One thing that people were originally excited about AIs was what if they could in a neutral way that was not government-imposed and not just about what the most popular view was,

sort of answer like false information in a way that's persuasive to people who are maybe skeptical of the mainstream media or whatever. And I think one of the hopes with Grok was that it would do that.

sort of answer like false information in a way that's persuasive to people who are maybe skeptical of the mainstream media or whatever. And I think one of the hopes with Grok was that it would do that.

sort of answer like false information in a way that's persuasive to people who are maybe skeptical of the mainstream media or whatever. And I think one of the hopes with Grok was that it would do that.

So I think Grok's batting average would look really good. That's because a lot of the questions that Grok gets asked are, in fact, very straightforward questions. What's the text of this law? What is this thing that's like settled science? Grok is going to get those right.

So I think Grok's batting average would look really good. That's because a lot of the questions that Grok gets asked are, in fact, very straightforward questions. What's the text of this law? What is this thing that's like settled science? Grok is going to get those right.

So I think Grok's batting average would look really good. That's because a lot of the questions that Grok gets asked are, in fact, very straightforward questions. What's the text of this law? What is this thing that's like settled science? Grok is going to get those right.

It's more interesting in cases where something is actually disputed or in cases where the answer you would find on the first page of Google searches isn't the right answer. I don't think Grok tends to perform well on those. But again, all of these AI models are way better at what they do than they were a year ago.

It's more interesting in cases where something is actually disputed or in cases where the answer you would find on the first page of Google searches isn't the right answer. I don't think Grok tends to perform well on those. But again, all of these AI models are way better at what they do than they were a year ago.