Kevin McKernan

And even then, the physicians handling it, it was kind of like, okay, we're not going to talk about that. But some of them would speak out about it. Some wouldn't. But it was still – it's still one of these – I could see – When the papers were getting written about this, they would nerf the papers.

They'd be like, all right, we did this study with Dravet syndrome and all the kids who got vaccinated got Dravet six months earlier. And then the conclusions would be there does seem to be an earlier onset of Dravet syndrome, which, by the way, if it's earlier, that might be the difference from your kid ever speaking and not speaking. But we should still get vaccinated.

They'd be like, all right, we did this study with Dravet syndrome and all the kids who got vaccinated got Dravet six months earlier. And then the conclusions would be there does seem to be an earlier onset of Dravet syndrome, which, by the way, if it's earlier, that might be the difference from your kid ever speaking and not speaking. But we should still get vaccinated.

They'd be like, all right, we did this study with Dravet syndrome and all the kids who got vaccinated got Dravet six months earlier. And then the conclusions would be there does seem to be an earlier onset of Dravet syndrome, which, by the way, if it's earlier, that might be the difference from your kid ever speaking and not speaking. But we should still get vaccinated.

Vaccines are important for public health. Like they would always bring out this greater good argument that that, OK, there might be some risk here, but the benefits outweigh the risks. And we're never going to show you that math. Right.

Vaccines are important for public health. Like they would always bring out this greater good argument that that, OK, there might be some risk here, but the benefits outweigh the risks. And we're never going to show you that math. Right.

Vaccines are important for public health. Like they would always bring out this greater good argument that that, OK, there might be some risk here, but the benefits outweigh the risks. And we're never going to show you that math. Right.

And I think that's a very dangerous form of public health when they begin socializing these types of equations and thinking about common good artifacts, because you can never really measure like. Good for who? Like what's the common good? Like what is that? That's very Hitler-esque. Like is it good for you? Is it good for me? So the vaccines always behave that way. They're herd medicine.

And I think that's a very dangerous form of public health when they begin socializing these types of equations and thinking about common good artifacts, because you can never really measure like. Good for who? Like what's the common good? Like what is that? That's very Hitler-esque. Like is it good for you? Is it good for me? So the vaccines always behave that way. They're herd medicine.

And I think that's a very dangerous form of public health when they begin socializing these types of equations and thinking about common good artifacts, because you can never really measure like. Good for who? Like what's the common good? Like what is that? That's very Hitler-esque. Like is it good for you? Is it good for me? So the vaccines always behave that way. They're herd medicine.

They're not an argument on individual sovereignty. They're not sort of a libertarian medicine, if you will. They're like you need to sacrifice your health because we're trying to save – Grandma. Yeah. And that is that's a socialist tradeoff that I think is always abused in the benefit of the people closest to the money machine.

They're not an argument on individual sovereignty. They're not sort of a libertarian medicine, if you will. They're like you need to sacrifice your health because we're trying to save – Grandma. Yeah. And that is that's a socialist tradeoff that I think is always abused in the benefit of the people closest to the money machine.

They're not an argument on individual sovereignty. They're not sort of a libertarian medicine, if you will. They're like you need to sacrifice your health because we're trying to save – Grandma. Yeah. And that is that's a socialist tradeoff that I think is always abused in the benefit of the people closest to the money machine.

Yep. Yeah. And if you ever speak to her again, just ask her, hey, can you tell me what kind of reimbursement you get for having 70 percent of your kids vaccinated?

Yep. Yeah. And if you ever speak to her again, just ask her, hey, can you tell me what kind of reimbursement you get for having 70 percent of your kids vaccinated?

Yep. Yeah. And if you ever speak to her again, just ask her, hey, can you tell me what kind of reimbursement you get for having 70 percent of your kids vaccinated?

Because there's kickbacks.

Because there's kickbacks.

Because there's kickbacks.

And Stark Law is supposed to be against that. But for some reason, they're playing those games. I think we saw that with Blue Cross Blue Shield and Anthem. Some of the numbers went around where they were giving reimbursements for doctors for getting people vaccinated with COVID. There was like $100 shots here and there, which is upsetting that that stuff is not more publicly known.