Kingy

WorkSafe have also made preliminary inquiries with the club, and this all came after Michael Voss.

Well, he went on the offensive yesterday, the coach, in defense of his club staff and the club's level of care for Hollands over the last few years since he joined the club, even though he admitted that as far as the process goes...

They deserve to have questions asked of them, and they have provided those answers to the best of their ability.

So now the ball is squarely in the court of the AFL at the moment.

Well, there's two things at play here.

I would have thought the longer this had gone, the furnace had turned to the club as much as anything.

And Michael Voss was saying the club had been bullied.

Bully for outcomes, I think was the phrase that he used.

Not so much Elijah Hollands, although I think if he'd been pressed further yesterday, Michael Voss, he might have taken aim at the fact there's been a photographer on the family lawn as well over the time at the Hollands' house, which I think...

is probably a bridge too far i think the media has treated the elijah holland side of things with well by and large at the risk of speaking for everyone i think mostly a deal of care most of the heat's come for for carl and i think carl deserved to have questions asked of them do they not i mean is it accountability or is it bullying i i love michael voss's press comments i thought bullying was probably a step too far it was a suggestion that he'd been drinking whilst you know

By a member of the media?

But is that factually correct?

Did Collingwood players believe that?

Yeah.

That was the report, wasn't it?

It doesn't mean they're correct, though.

And in fact, as we sit here now, I'd say they're blatantly incorrect.

You'd like it confirmed, though, wouldn't you?

You wouldn't want more than that.

Hang on.