Konstantin Kisin

Mark Carney, who's the Prime Minister of Canada now, after Davos and the US administration presented a whole different geopolitical vision, effectively, at that meeting, he came out and he talked about the fact that countries like Canada and the UK and Australia, they basically need to get very upset with the US and have their own little clique that they work together while challenging the US or working with China.

Do you think this is a good way of approaching things?

Yeah.

And moving to geopolitics a little bit, do you have a clear understanding of what the Americans are doing, what their posture is towards the world?

And obviously that will affect Canada as well.

Here's what I'm trying to get into, right?

And we can talk about all of those things, and I think we should.

I think a lot of people thought that Trump 2.0 would be a little bit like Trump 1.0.

and suddenly you know he's talking about canada becoming a state of the united states he's talking about invading greenland and he's taking real action and some of it i'm a big fan of you know getting get rid of maduro great you know iran is you know more difficult that we can talk about the pluses and minuses but what i think is happening is there is a clear

different perspective that they have.

They've shifted their entire attitude towards geopolitics, the world, and they're taking a totally different approach.

Do you understand the rationale and the logic behind that?

Do you see what they're trying to do?

And do you worry that what is happening in Iran now, I mean, I don't, I'm someone who's, you know, happy to see intervention when I think it's good, but I also very, very, you know, I grew up in the era of Iraq and Afghanistan.

We both did, right?

I imagine you did too.

And those were not things, I think, objectively speaking, that led to positive outcomes that everybody would want.

Are you worried that perhaps, you know, President Trump's felt like he's on a roll and he can just keep going and sometimes he's gonna go too far and there will be a lot of drawbacks to the policies he's pursuing?

Isn't that what we said about Gaddafi and Saddam and all these other people?

I don't see how it's... And I was like, yeah, they're bad people, but what comes after is my question.