Konstantin Kisin

You can run simulations, you can just run it millions and millions and millions of times, and AI is just thriving on data, right?

The more data you have, the better it gets this thing.

This is why it's so good at software engineering because there's all this code out there that you can train it on.

With robotics,

there's no equivalent of just billions of lines of code that just exist somewhere.

There's not these trillions of video files.

It's not just video files.

The robot has to feel itself.

manipulating the world and seeing the effect it has.

I've just described what it is.

Let me say what it would mean if that were achieved.

They say that 40% of the labor force is doing work that can be done remotely.

That is on the order of tens of trillions of dollars of wages that are being paid to humans every single year to do work that can be done remotely.

Currently, labs are making on the order, if you just add up all the revenues, how much money OpenAI and Anthropic and Google are making, they're making, I don't know, the numbers keep exploding, so who knows what the most recent numbers are, but they'd say close to $40-$50 billion.

We're talking about an addressable market here with all knowledge work that is tens of trillions of dollars.

So literally a thousand X bigger than what they're doing right now.

So it explains why they're interested in it.

It would also mean that a lot of people's jobs would be gone.

It would also mean... It would mean a lot of things, right?

It would mean... It's a terrible thing in one sense.