Konstantin Kisin

Then there was an era from the late 1990s to 2012, where humans would lose to AIs.

But human plus AI teams would do better than AIs alone.

And from, I think, 2012 onwards, it's gone through the case that AI alone, adding a human just adds sort of noise into the system.

It's a monkey jumbling things around.

And just letting the AI make the decisions on the chessboard is the best thing to do.

I think that will be an interesting conundrum for society because we will get to that point at some point.

I think right now we have this bias.

There's this word slob that's used for whenever AI comes up with something because it's just not that good.

It doesn't have a really good sense of taste.

I think this is a temporary thing.

Over time, our bias will flip towards, at some point it'll be like the

the sense we have about Japanese manufacturing back in the 80s.

And then it will become something where you just don't want to touch it.

If AI made it, it's sort of like if it just came out of the mouth of Mozart or something.

As its ability to, its taste, its intelligence, everything improves over time.

You're going to listen to this.

You're selling us quite strongly.

I mean, I'd go even further than that.

So there was this incredibly interesting dialogue that somebody had with an AI where they asked the AI, reflect on your own experience.

You know, just tell me about what it's like to be you.