Kristin Davison

Here, we're going into a situation where you have so many different scenarios and so many different races, and every single one is going to have

almost like a snowflake.

They're each different.

Each path to victory is going to be different.

And so if you go with blunt force with money and PACs and have the same playbook in every single congressional race in every single state, it is not going to be as effective.

And so I think where both the old guard and the new guard can come together is really in this philosophy to let data drive things.

I think everyone kind of believes that.

And then to also be very targeted and specific in the role.

If you have a super PAC that's going to

spread wide and spread far and kind of do the same thing, it's not going to be as successful versus sticking to one thing and focus on it.

So if they're just going to go and focus on bringing out low prop Trump voters, that's an admirable cause.

Go and do that.

Don't try to play in too many races where you're going to spread too thin and not be effective.

So I think both sides need to kind of, that's not even both sides.

I think we over-talk this division at the same time.

The donor pool is not as big as people think.

There's like a thousand people in the country that

They give that amount of money.

And so it's the same folks that have been given 20 years ago that are given today to these groups.

So there's a lot of crossover.