Larry Sanger

sort of vote taking.

Now we're skipping ahead to thesis six.

Okay, I don't want to jump too far.

Okay.

So the second one is enable competing articles.

So I've already explained this idea about GASP, the GASP framework, again, globalist, academic, secular, progressive.

Now,

If Wikipedia continues to... And again, this flows out of the very policies that they have now, especially if you look at certain commonly cited, what they call essays on Wikipedia.

It's very clear that they have this framework and that it is in operation.

So what about everybody else who disagrees with...

some aspect of it.

There's an article, for example, about Yahweh, which is the name of my God.

It's the name of the Christian God and the name of the Jewish God.

It is the name that is translated the Lord in the Bible.

And the article in Wikipedia about Yahweh, that's the title of the article, Yahweh, nothing else, says Yahweh was, past tense,

the head of a pantheon of ancient, I don't know, Israelite gods, or maybe they say Canaanite, I think maybe Canaanite.

And it's, well, first of all, that's very speculative, right?

So we don't know that for sure.

that is widely believed by especially secular Bible scholars.

And the line is that...