Larry Sanger

This deity then was sort of pressed into service and made the only God, the creator God.

But it took a long time for this process to happen.

Whereas if you actually ask believing Christians and Jews and even Muslims, they will tell you that, no, in fact, God gave his name to Moses.

And his name was at least used in the book of Genesis, and it's used all throughout the Torah, the first five books of the Bible.

And these, again, on a traditional confessional view, were written by Moses, who actually talked to God.

And so that's where we got the name, the Tetragrammaton, as you say, and not this way.

I see.

So this just tells one view and simply ignores the religious view.

Now, I'm not saying that the religious view is correct and that it should be stated in wiki voice, but this should not be stated in wiki voice.

This...

This view that's stated here should be in the second or third paragraph and attributed to its owners.

Yeah.

And I'll tell you, this article is not totally devoid of value because it does tell you what people like that think.

Right.

Right.

But the fact that it only tells you that means that it's biased in favor of what they think.

Right, right.

So the second thesis then, enable competing articles, would say, okay, look, if Wikipedia is set on having that particular article, right, then you should declare that this is according to the GASP framework, right, and other frameworks should be permitted, right?

And therefore, you know, a Christian framework, perhaps it would be a Catholic framework and a Protestant framework.

Who knows exactly where the lines will be drawn there and whether people will be able to just, you know, create their own frameworks willy nilly or whatever.