Larry Sanger

Yeah.

And I'll tell you, this article is not totally devoid of value because it does tell you what people like that think.

Right.

Right.

But the fact that it only tells you that means that it's biased in favor of what they think.

Right, right.

So the second thesis then, enable competing articles, would say, okay, look, if Wikipedia is set on having that particular article, right, then you should declare that this is according to the GASP framework, right, and other frameworks should be permitted, right?

And therefore, you know, a Christian framework, perhaps it would be a Catholic framework and a Protestant framework.

Who knows exactly where the lines will be drawn there and whether people will be able to just, you know, create their own frameworks willy nilly or whatever.

And of course, if an article is not well rated by anybody, then it shouldn't even get into the main namespace as it's called in Wikipedia.

Shouldn't be shown to the public easily anyway.

Yeah.

So the idea then is then there can be multiple competing articles on the same topic.

So a number of different articles on Yahweh, for example, or on the violence in Gaza.

This is completely wrong.

People are centrists.

Articles are not centrist.

All right.

So people are objective or people are biased on one side or to the other side.

In other words, they're opinionated.