Larry Sanger

There's an article, for example, about Yahweh, which is the name of my God.

It's the name of the Christian God and the name of the Jewish God.

It is the name that is translated the Lord in the Bible.

And the article in Wikipedia about Yahweh, that's the title of the article, Yahweh, nothing else, says Yahweh was, past tense,

the head of a pantheon of ancient, I don't know, Israelite gods, or maybe they say Canaanite, I think maybe Canaanite.

And it's, well, first of all, that's very speculative, right?

So we don't know that for sure.

that is widely believed by especially secular Bible scholars.

And the line is that...

This deity then was sort of pressed into service and made the only God, the creator God.

But it took a long time for this process to happen.

Whereas if you actually ask believing Christians and Jews and even Muslims, they will tell you that, no, in fact, God gave his name to Moses.

And his name was at least used in the book of Genesis, and it's used all throughout the Torah, the first five books of the Bible.

And these, again, on a traditional confessional view, were written by Moses, who actually talked to God.

And so that's where we got the name, the Tetragrammaton, as you say, and not this way.

I see.

So this just tells one view and simply ignores the religious view.

Now, I'm not saying that the religious view is correct and that it should be stated in wiki voice, but this should not be stated in wiki voice.

This...

This view that's stated here should be in the second or third paragraph and attributed to its owners.