Larry Sanger

Sometimes there's dispute resolution and so forth.

And often what happens at some point is there's a kind of vote-taking issue

It's not supposed to be democratic.

They say it's not democratic, but to that extent, it is.

They don't necessarily tally the vote, but usually the vote is strongly on one side or the other.

And when it is...

then they say that's the consensus.

Sometimes, though, when there is such vote-taking, some administrator or just very distinguished, you know...

long-lasting uh wikipedia editor steps in and and overrules the whole procedure and says yes this is not in keeping with our policy obviously and so i'm just going to shut this down that they do that sort of thing quite a bit just ending discussions um including ending um these sorts of

sort of vote taking.

Now we're skipping ahead to thesis six.

Okay, I don't want to jump too far.

Okay.

So the second one is enable competing articles.

So I've already explained this idea about GASP, the GASP framework, again, globalist, academic, secular, progressive.

Now,

If Wikipedia continues to... And again, this flows out of the very policies that they have now, especially if you look at certain commonly cited, what they call essays on Wikipedia.

It's very clear that they have this framework and that it is in operation.

So what about everybody else who disagrees with...

some aspect of it.