Lauren Feiner

You know, Meta would obviously dispute that theoretical version of the future, but I think that's really what this whole case is about.

A lot of people feel like the algorithm knows what they want to see, has like just the right amount of randomness to keep them interested. And that's really powerful.

A lot of people feel like the algorithm knows what they want to see, has like just the right amount of randomness to keep them interested. And that's really powerful.

A lot of people feel like the algorithm knows what they want to see, has like just the right amount of randomness to keep them interested. And that's really powerful.

Lawmakers got to see all of this classified information, but the general public really hasn't seen the same information. And I think that's really made a lot of people question, well, you know, how dangerous is this app and why can't the government explain to us why this bill needs to be in place to protect us?

Lawmakers got to see all of this classified information, but the general public really hasn't seen the same information. And I think that's really made a lot of people question, well, you know, how dangerous is this app and why can't the government explain to us why this bill needs to be in place to protect us?

Lawmakers got to see all of this classified information, but the general public really hasn't seen the same information. And I think that's really made a lot of people question, well, you know, how dangerous is this app and why can't the government explain to us why this bill needs to be in place to protect us?

Specifically, they want to know whether the bill violates the First Amendment.

Specifically, they want to know whether the bill violates the First Amendment.

Specifically, they want to know whether the bill violates the First Amendment.

Does he mean he'll just try to facilitate a sale of TikTok? Or does he mean he would literally try to stop the law, perhaps by telling his Department of Justice not to enforce it? I think we don't totally know what he's thinking right now. But there's kind of a limited amount that Trump can do, given that this bill passed into law and so far has been upheld by the courts.

Does he mean he'll just try to facilitate a sale of TikTok? Or does he mean he would literally try to stop the law, perhaps by telling his Department of Justice not to enforce it? I think we don't totally know what he's thinking right now. But there's kind of a limited amount that Trump can do, given that this bill passed into law and so far has been upheld by the courts.

Does he mean he'll just try to facilitate a sale of TikTok? Or does he mean he would literally try to stop the law, perhaps by telling his Department of Justice not to enforce it? I think we don't totally know what he's thinking right now. But there's kind of a limited amount that Trump can do, given that this bill passed into law and so far has been upheld by the courts.

It's really going to fall to companies like Apple and Google that run app store marketplaces to stop updating the app. So you might be able to use it in the short term, but over time it will increasingly decrease in quality.

It's really going to fall to companies like Apple and Google that run app store marketplaces to stop updating the app. So you might be able to use it in the short term, but over time it will increasingly decrease in quality.

It's really going to fall to companies like Apple and Google that run app store marketplaces to stop updating the app. So you might be able to use it in the short term, but over time it will increasingly decrease in quality.

Thanks for having me.

Thanks for having me.

Thanks for having me.

This trial is about Google's advertising technology business, and that's a business where Google has a role in several different parts of the market. Basically, you have the publisher side, you have the advertiser side, and you have the technology that sits in the middle and facilitates the buying and selling of ad inventory.