Lee Zeldin

Stacey Abrams just wants us to take her word for it. But I don't know what in her qualification says that we should just be sending over $2 billion to her and her friends to let them spend as they wish with reduced oversight. One other example was $5 billion. went to another organization that was the former employer of the director of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for the Biden EPA.

The self-dealing and conflicts of interest included Democratic donors, former Biden and Obama officials. And as you pointed out here at the top of the segment, playing that clip of a Biden EPA official, it was in their words that they were throwing gold bars off the Titanic. Gold bars are tax dollars. Off the Titanic meant they knew they were wasting it.

The self-dealing and conflicts of interest included Democratic donors, former Biden and Obama officials. And as you pointed out here at the top of the segment, playing that clip of a Biden EPA official, it was in their words that they were throwing gold bars off the Titanic. Gold bars are tax dollars. Off the Titanic meant they knew they were wasting it.

The self-dealing and conflicts of interest included Democratic donors, former Biden and Obama officials. And as you pointed out here at the top of the segment, playing that clip of a Biden EPA official, it was in their words that they were throwing gold bars off the Titanic. Gold bars are tax dollars. Off the Titanic meant they knew they were wasting it.

Yeah, it's kind of all of the above. It's a green slush fund to their friends, getting out the door as part of their agenda before President Trump gets sworn into office. And that's why I am so upset and concerned and frustrated and motivated to do something about the abuse of these terms, climate change and environmental justice.

Yeah, it's kind of all of the above. It's a green slush fund to their friends, getting out the door as part of their agenda before President Trump gets sworn into office. And that's why I am so upset and concerned and frustrated and motivated to do something about the abuse of these terms, climate change and environmental justice.

Yeah, it's kind of all of the above. It's a green slush fund to their friends, getting out the door as part of their agenda before President Trump gets sworn into office. And that's why I am so upset and concerned and frustrated and motivated to do something about the abuse of these terms, climate change and environmental justice.

Don't tell me that you're advocating for some community that needs to have clean air, land, and water, and in order to get there, you need to remediate environmental concern and then spend a dollar not on fixing that, but instead give it to your friends.

Don't tell me that you're advocating for some community that needs to have clean air, land, and water, and in order to get there, you need to remediate environmental concern and then spend a dollar not on fixing that, but instead give it to your friends.

Don't tell me that you're advocating for some community that needs to have clean air, land, and water, and in order to get there, you need to remediate environmental concern and then spend a dollar not on fixing that, but instead give it to your friends.

There are people who are talking about climate change in a way that is trying to justify what is tens of billions of dollars or into the trillions of dollars if you wanna talk about the Green New Deal. And they don't care about the fact that the people who can least afford it are the ones who get harmed the most.

There are people who are talking about climate change in a way that is trying to justify what is tens of billions of dollars or into the trillions of dollars if you wanna talk about the Green New Deal. And they don't care about the fact that the people who can least afford it are the ones who get harmed the most.

There are people who are talking about climate change in a way that is trying to justify what is tens of billions of dollars or into the trillions of dollars if you wanna talk about the Green New Deal. And they don't care about the fact that the people who can least afford it are the ones who get harmed the most.

They're not respecting choice and the ability of the American consumer to decide what kind of a vehicle to have, how they want to heat their home, or to be even able to afford to be able to pay the bills for this stuff. So this is about getting back to common sense.

They're not respecting choice and the ability of the American consumer to decide what kind of a vehicle to have, how they want to heat their home, or to be even able to afford to be able to pay the bills for this stuff. So this is about getting back to common sense.

They're not respecting choice and the ability of the American consumer to decide what kind of a vehicle to have, how they want to heat their home, or to be even able to afford to be able to pay the bills for this stuff. So this is about getting back to common sense.

And I don't want, I don't think that the wool should be pulled over the eyes of Americans, Americans across the spectrum, conservatives, moderates, liberals, Republicans, Democrats, independents. We all want a clean environment. We all want clean air, land and water.

And I don't want, I don't think that the wool should be pulled over the eyes of Americans, Americans across the spectrum, conservatives, moderates, liberals, Republicans, Democrats, independents. We all want a clean environment. We all want clean air, land and water.

And I don't want, I don't think that the wool should be pulled over the eyes of Americans, Americans across the spectrum, conservatives, moderates, liberals, Republicans, Democrats, independents. We all want a clean environment. We all want clean air, land and water.

Stop trying to turn it into a wedge issue where you have to choose to either go with whatever Bernie Sanders is proposing or you're an outcast who wants to, you know, change the air back to the way it was, you know, a half a century ago.