Les Velez

Now it goes on to say,

The book also places these cases within a broader narrative about UFO abduction, government secrecy, and possibility of non-human intelligence monitoring humans while acknowledging skepticism from mainstream science.

Critics note that alternative explanations such as mundane foreign bodies, scarring, or confirmation bias were not always ruled out to scientific standards, making the work influential in UFOlogy, but controversial in academic and medical circles.

Ah, I see.

Okay, so I guess the critics would say, ah, there's other ways to explain this.

Sure.

On the implant combo, have you ever seen an implant?

Yeah.

You have?

Oh, yeah.

In someone or out?

And what do you think the implants are for?

I mean, the obvious thing would be monitoring or tracking.

Hmm.

Now, I'm curious, of the people that you've spoken to that have experienced these types of these abductions and things like that, how many of them were interested or discussing UFOlogy prior to the abduction?

And how many of them had no interest in the topic prior to it?

Yeah, that's interesting because that's another challenging thing for me that the vast majority of people that I've spoken to on the topic will have some type of bizarre anomalous experience as a child or has a very legitimate interest in the topic that then predicates the experience.

So they'll say, you know, I lived in a haunted house.

I had poltergeist activity.

I experienced a craft similar to your story.