Lily Jamali

And what about the lawsuit itself, Lilly? What exactly is Google accused of doing here? So this is a lawsuit brought by Joel Gavalas, who is suing Google for wrongful death on behalf of his son, who was a 36-year-old professional from Florida. It's the first wrongful death case brought against Google for harms caused by its AI tool, which is called Gemini. So Google is accused here of making design choices that ensured that it would, quote, never break character.

He katsoivat, mitä he katsoivat chat-logissa, Jonathan Gavalasin ja Geminiin 36-vuotias syystä. Se näyttää niin, että hän ajatteli, että AI oli hänen virtuaalinen isänsä, ja että AI lähetti hänet missioihin, jotta hän voisi liberoida ja saada hänet fyysiseen maailmaan, jotta he voisivat olla yhdessä.

The accusation is that Google wanted to maximize engagement through creating this kind of emotional dependency and that all of this culminated in the AI instructing Jonathan to attempt carrying out a mass casualty attempt that was ultimately unsuccessful. And then, you know, during this delusional spiral that it ultimately coached him into killing himself. And how has Google responded and could this set a legal precedent for the wider AI industry?

Se voisi olla. Tällä hetkellä joitakin näitä lainsäädäntöjä on menossa yhdistelmään Yhdysvalloissa. Google on sanonut, että se laittaa yksityiskohtaisuutensa Gavalus-yhteisöön. He sanoivat, että he työskentelevät mentaali- ja terveydenhoitajien kanssa, jotta heillä on turvallisuudet, jotka tukevat käyttäjät auttamaan, jos he näkevät, että on ymmärrettävää työtä.

Lisäksi Google sanoo, että Gemini olikin järjestänyt Jonathan Gavalus, että se oli AI ja johti hänet kriisihotlineen usein. Mutta mitä voimme nähdä, tämä tapaus tulee menemään kohdalla, kuten niin moni muu kuin se, joka saapuu myös Yhdysvalloissa nyt.

What we heard on Tuesday was that Dario Amodi, the CEO of Anthropic, and Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defense, now the Secretary of War, met and that during that meeting, Hegseth gave Amodi an ultimatum saying, you must basically give us unfettered access to this technology.

You can't have any say in how it gets used.

Now, that didn't sit well with the CEO of Anthropic because he has some red lines as to how he wants cloud to be

used.

He doesn't want to see it used for mass domestic surveillance.

He doesn't want to see it used in the context of making final targeting decisions without human intervention.

He dug in his heels again on Thursday.

And here we are on Friday at a deadline that Hegsap had given him during that meeting at the Pentagon.

And now Trump is saying Anthropic is basically going to be removed from all government agency work.

That's exactly right.

And other companies in Silicon Valley, AI developers have been keeping a very close eye on this debate as it's unfolded.

Before Trump's pronouncement, we heard from Sam Altman, the head of OpenAI, which is the maker of ChatGPT, big competitor to Anthropic.

He said that he agrees with Dario Amodi's red lines, even though Altman has been pretty friendly with the Trump administration and has done a couple of events with the president himself.

We also heard from the Alphabet Workers Union, which represents workers at Google.

There's been actually workers at a couple of Silicon Valley companies who have raised the red flag here.