Lori Siegel

If things just continue to operate as they do because we have been unable to take out all the drones or all the ballistic missile programs.

As we warned, you could take out 95%, but even that 5%, if the interceptors are low, they can do a shit ton of damage.

So here we are.

Now we have to do something to change the strategic calculus because the status quo is not going to work.

So you could either have diplomacy or you would have to have an invasion to go in and to secure and to change the status quo.

And that is the problem.

Also, don't just take my word for it.

Put B4 up there on the screen.

Another piece of analysis.

This is from the Jerusalem Post, who obviously would know.

Operation Epic Fury has drained one third of the bad supply, so their estimate's even higher, or a little bit lower, and replenishment could take eight years.

While the 90% hit rate is elite, every launch against Iran depletes the readiness needed for potential conflict with China.

And remember, we already stripped a decent amount

out of South Korea, of a lot of these interceptors, and they take years to rebuild.

Literally only, you know, for some, Patriot, I think it's just like one facility, et cetera.

The biggest problem now is, okay, so ground troops, to do what?

Well, as they said for this final blow, to take control of the Straits of Hormuz, I think,

that the nuclear facility option is the one that makes the most sense.

And it's because for every one of these wartime leaders to change things, they need to do something big, and especially Trump, spectacular.

And you can declare victory.