Lori Siegel

Or is the only one where he could potentially try and sell it as the end.

Now, I don't even think it would be the end.

I don't even think it would be the end.

I think it would probably get us deeper into it.

But in his mind, a true surrender is not on the table.

You have to do something.

That's all I can see them trying to do right now.

Of course, this is just me.

I could be wrong.

The other thing I've been thinking a lot about, let's put the next one up here, just to kind of prove this point out, is that we actually have made this existential for a couple of parties.

One is Israel, because now they're screwed.

They have to finish the job, right?

Because now they really are a threat.

And they're really low on interceptors.

The other is the Gulf.

So how can the Gulf truly be safe with an existing Iranian regime?

They can't, right?

They need regime change now at this point, even though they wanted to avoid it in the past.

Well, here we have some reporting from the New York Times that Emily flagged, which is that the MBS, the leader of Saudi Arabia, has been arguing that the United States should consider putting ground troops in Iran to seize energy infrastructure and to force the government out of power.

Why?