Luis Elizondo

Same thing with, for example, a space shuttle. It goes out into space and it can glide down, but it's not a very good airplane. It comes down like a brick, you know, because there's design compromises and performance compromises. But what we are seeing doesn't have any of that attributable compromise. These objects aren't slowing down. They're not changing their performance capabilities.

Same thing with, for example, a space shuttle. It goes out into space and it can glide down, but it's not a very good airplane. It comes down like a brick, you know, because there's design compromises and performance compromises. But what we are seeing doesn't have any of that attributable compromise. These objects aren't slowing down. They're not changing their performance capabilities.

Same thing with, for example, a space shuttle. It goes out into space and it can glide down, but it's not a very good airplane. It comes down like a brick, you know, because there's design compromises and performance compromises. But what we are seeing doesn't have any of that attributable compromise. These objects aren't slowing down. They're not changing their performance capabilities.

They can do the same thing that we're seeing in the air now. and possibly in space and even underwater. So that is a fundamentally different type of technology than we are used to dealing with.

They can do the same thing that we're seeing in the air now. and possibly in space and even underwater. So that is a fundamentally different type of technology than we are used to dealing with.

They can do the same thing that we're seeing in the air now. and possibly in space and even underwater. So that is a fundamentally different type of technology than we are used to dealing with.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah. So we had some of the best scientists on the team, folks like Dr. Hal Pudoff and some other folks. I'm not allowed to say their names. Dr. Davis and some others that were doing the calculations, mathematical calculations on how this is possible. And the consensus was by by the scientists, not me, because I'm not a I'm not a. I'm not a physics expert. I'm not an astrophysicist.

Yeah. So we had some of the best scientists on the team, folks like Dr. Hal Pudoff and some other folks. I'm not allowed to say their names. Dr. Davis and some others that were doing the calculations, mathematical calculations on how this is possible. And the consensus was by by the scientists, not me, because I'm not a I'm not a. I'm not a physics expert. I'm not an astrophysicist.

Yeah. So we had some of the best scientists on the team, folks like Dr. Hal Pudoff and some other folks. I'm not allowed to say their names. Dr. Davis and some others that were doing the calculations, mathematical calculations on how this is possible. And the consensus was by by the scientists, not me, because I'm not a I'm not a. I'm not a physics expert. I'm not an astrophysicist.

They were saying that – so let me back up here. Initially, the government for years was trying to identify the different exotic technologies that could explain the different performance characteristics. And it was during the ATIP years that the scientists had this consensus that if you had one type of technology, if you could do one thing, all these other observables now become possible.

They were saying that – so let me back up here. Initially, the government for years was trying to identify the different exotic technologies that could explain the different performance characteristics. And it was during the ATIP years that the scientists had this consensus that if you had one type of technology, if you could do one thing, all these other observables now become possible.

They were saying that – so let me back up here. Initially, the government for years was trying to identify the different exotic technologies that could explain the different performance characteristics. And it was during the ATIP years that the scientists had this consensus that if you had one type of technology, if you could do one thing, all these other observables now become possible.

Kind of think of like a unifying theory. And so if you had the ability to create this bubble around you in a localized area that insulated you from the effects of Earth's gravity. Now, what is gravity? People think that, you know, when I... Drop my glasses. That's gravity. That's not gravity. That's an effect of gravity. Gravity is the warping of space-time.

Kind of think of like a unifying theory. And so if you had the ability to create this bubble around you in a localized area that insulated you from the effects of Earth's gravity. Now, what is gravity? People think that, you know, when I... Drop my glasses. That's gravity. That's not gravity. That's an effect of gravity. Gravity is the warping of space-time.

Kind of think of like a unifying theory. And so if you had the ability to create this bubble around you in a localized area that insulated you from the effects of Earth's gravity. Now, what is gravity? People think that, you know, when I... Drop my glasses. That's gravity. That's not gravity. That's an effect of gravity. Gravity is the warping of space-time.

And that's important because people don't – you hear the term thrown around a lot. But they don't realize that space and time are actually connected. They are one and the same. They're opposite sides, if you will, of the same coin. And so you can't have one without the other. And so you have this ability to create a bubble around you that insulates you from the warping of space time.

And that's important because people don't – you hear the term thrown around a lot. But they don't realize that space and time are actually connected. They are one and the same. They're opposite sides, if you will, of the same coin. And so you can't have one without the other. And so you have this ability to create a bubble around you that insulates you from the warping of space time.