Marek Olszewski

The first hard fork being, of course, the transition to becoming NL2.

Then we had two more pretty meaty ones.

And then the third one was super meaty, where we added succinct support.

And now you can do fault proofs using ZK proofs.

So we have a ZK fault proof system, very similar to MegaEth.

We also use EigenVA, similar to MegaEth.

But unlike MegaEth,

the were cheaper than them and were rated on l2 beat and they you know they put us at the top of the up to me and validity and tab as of last month as of december so yeah if you like something like mega youth you know you're definitely going to like solo i think even more more secure as per l2 beat uh cheaper and you know i think equally scalable

Obviously, the Tempo team got a lot of pushback when they announced the L1 direction.

Matt, I think, publicly came out and said, you know, finality is a big reason.

We're payments focused.

We need to have fast finality.

And, you know, there's some truth to that.

Celo had one block finality as an L1 and then we transitioned to becoming L2.

And now we have to wait for Ethereum finality, which, as you know, can take quite a bit longer.

And so I think you could argue the finality reason.

Of course, Ethereum is working to add, you know, one or two block finality.

It's working towards shortening its block time.

So that problem will go away soon.

And so either they didn't want to wait for that, or they didn't believe that that would happen, or, you know, they're using this as, you know, a technical reason, but really it's something else.