Mark Gagnon

That's fair.

And I use the edge case, obviously, to illustrate sort of the point, just to beg the question, to push it to its, you know, farthest conclusion.

I see.

Yeah.

The fourth here, this is the original neutrality policy, which I think we've spoken about.

I see.

Creating an open environment that people are sort of voracious and eager to contribute new information.

Yeah, I mean, I'm enjoying this.

I mean, six seems fairly, I actually, I think most people would be pretty much in lockstep with this.

Like, yeah, we should know who the people are that are editing this, like any type of newspaper.

Um, or any type of media source, right?

Like if I'm reading an article and I see who it's written by and I've read other articles by them, it'll imply me or it'll sort of clue me into what their implicit bias is so that at the very least I can understand why they are writing this or where this information is coming from.

That's strange.

So... Is there pushback on this point?

Do people disagree with you here?

Well, I can imagine these 62 would disagree, but does the vast majority of other people, do you get pushback on this point?

This one seems fairly clear.

What is the steel man to support their... What they say is simply that this place is...

Or give a justification for why this person specifically is anonymous.

I could see the case of someone living in some type of totalitarian regime where any type of criticism against the leader can lead to death.