Mark Zuckerberg

I think that there's a lot of debate around things like, is this going to create existential risk to humanity?

And I think that those are very hard things to disprove one way or another.

My own intuition is that the point at which we become close to superintelligence is that

And it's just really unclear to me that the current technology is going to get there without another set of significant advances.

But that doesn't mean that there's no danger.

I think the danger is basically amplifying the kind of known set of harms that people or sets of accounts can do.

And we just need to make sure that we really focus on basically doing that as well as possible.

So that's definitely a big focus for me.

Yeah, and that's a lot of the fine-tuning and the alignment training that we do is basically when we ship AIs across our products, a lot of what we're trying to make sure is that you can't ask it to help you commit a crime.

So I think training it to kind of understand that

And it's not like any of these systems are ever going to be 100% perfect, but just making it so that this isn't an easier way to go about doing something bad than the next best alternative.

I mean, people still have Google.

You still have search engines, so the information is out there.

And

For these, you know, we see is like for nation states or, you know, these actors that are trying to pull off these large, you know, coordinated and authentic networks to kind of influence different things.

At some point when we would just make it very difficult, they do just, you know, try to use other services instead, right?

It's just like if you can make it more expensive for them to do it on your service, then it's

then kind of people go elsewhere.

And I think that that's the bar, right?

It's not like, okay, are you ever going to be perfect at finding every adversary who tries to attack you?