Mark Zuckerberg

But obviously I can't speak for them.

Yeah, I guess in the past, I probably just...

Most of the comments that I made, I think, were in the context of content moderation.

It's been an interesting journey over the last 10 years on this, where it's obviously been an interesting time in history.

There have been novel questions raised about online content moderation.

Some of those have led to, I think, productive new systems getting built, like our AI systems to be able to detect nation states trying to interfere in each other's elections.

I think we will continue building that stuff out, and that, I think, has been net positive.

I think other stuff...

We went down some bad paths.

I just think the fact-checking thing was not as effective as Community Notes because it's not an internet-scale solution.

There weren't enough fact-checkers, and people didn't trust the specific fact-checkers.

You want a more robust system.

So I think where we got with Community Notes is the right one on that.

But my point on this was more that...

I think historically I probably deferred a little bit too much to either the media and kind of their critiques or the government on things that they did not really have authority over, but just as like a central figure.

Like I think we tried to build systems that were maybe we could not have to make all of the content moderation decisions ourselves or something.

And I guess I just think part of the growth process over the last,

10 years is just, okay, like we're a meaningful company.

We need to own the decisions that we need to make.

We should listen to feedback from people, but shouldn't defer too much to people who are not, who do not actually have authority over this because at the end of the day, we're like, we're in the seat and we need to like own the decisions that we make.