Matt Murphy

Kobergerin tapauksessa, muistatko, Megan? Hänellä oli koko kiireinen osa, ihmiset laittoi rahoja hänelle kirjojaan. Se oli monta luonnollista luonnollista, jotka ajattelevat, että he tietävät paremmin, koska heillä on ystävä, joka antoi heille jotain freaking podcastia konspiratiivisen teoriaan. Se on epäloitavaa. Monet ihmisiä eivät tiedä tätä. Se on epäloitavaa, sekä moderneista sääntöä kuin ABAa, mutta Kaliforniassa työntekijät vahvistavat tutkijan lopettamista tämän tapauksessa.

Se on niin kuin pressikonferenssi, jonka näimme Nathana Hockmanilla eilen Lähtökohtaisesti. Hän teki sen juuri oikein. Siirrytään kuitenkin takaisin. Feds ovat todella hyviä monimuotoisista asioista.

they're not good at murders. This is, at the end of the day, as much national attention and interest as there is, this is a state case. State prosecutors in murder cases, fed prosecutors, federal prosecutors are really good at white-collar crime. That's basically the way, and we, again, Arthur's right. I'm agreeing with him so much at this point, but look, Didi's a perfect example. It really is. But the reason why the feds had to go after Didi Megan is because George Gascon, who was a

A terrible DA in Los Angeles wasn't pursuing any of those like that slam dunk domestic violence case that we saw regarding the beating of Cassie Ventura. That was not being pursued in state court because the district attorney was terrible in my opinion. So that's why the feds had to come in. This is one where.

The Utah authorities have this in hand. This goes to the 10th Circuit, by the way, Utah's 10th, not 9th Circuit, which is the most liberal federal circuit in the country, which means this guy really has, they're going to convict him based on this evidence, and it's going to be upheld on appeal as long as they don't do stupid things like releasing evidence that they have to appease people online. Well, the other thing is, you tell me, Arthur, but let's say the mom and the dad

Olen oppinut Alan Jacksonista vuosia. Hän oli L.E.D.A.ssa pitkän aikaa, kun työskennellin homo-saitoissa Orange Countyissä. Hän on todella taloudellinen tutkija. Hän on itse asiassa hyvä.

Mutta sinä olet täysin oikeassa. Hän pitäisi pitää vaikeaa aikaa näiden videoiden kanssa. Kalifornia käyttää sitä, mitä kutsutaan McNaughton-kirjasta. Luulen, että New York on melko erilaista, Arthur, jos en ole välttämättömyys. Ja tietysti se on 150-vuotias kirja, joka antaa, että jos ymmärrät taustasi ja tekoasiasi, olet vastuullinen heille, vaikka olet syntynyt mielenterveydestä tai syntynyt intoxikaatiosta.

So what a jury essentially has to find, and the burden is on the defense to establish that by preponderance of the evidence. So what that means is if you've got somebody that's howling at the moon and they don't know what they're doing, that's a case that you might have a shot at insanity. Otherwise, even if they're drunk, even if

even if they are suffering from mental illness. If they understand the nature and quality of their actions, in other words, they understand that they're killing human beings and not stabbing bananas or aliens or whatever crazy delusion they're suffering from, they are legally responsible in the state of California. And as crazy as California is, and it feels like it gets a little crazier every day, sort of pro-defendant, that is a law that they haven't touched yet.

and that is the current state of the law. Matt, is sanity a jury question? I'm sorry? Yes. Is sanity a jury question? Yeah, so California uses what's known as a bifurcated system, Megan, where first you have a guilt phase, and then you have a sanity phase. It's like a death penalty case. We have a guilt phase and then a penalty phase. One of my last murders before I left the DA's office was a case that was

It was my Nicholson case out of Newport Beach where a young, very entitled, very wealthy young man who was suffering from pretty well documented organic mental illness mixed with addiction got into it with his parents and he

He stabbed his mother and father to death in the house and he also waited for the housekeeper. That case just went to trial on October 31st this year. A friend of mine, I handed the baton to you when I walked out of the office, my friend Dave Porter. That guy had documented organic mental illness in addition to it.

But the bar is really high on insanity. And that jury found him legally sane. And his sentencing is coming up actually at the end of this week. So a jury, despite really well documented actual mental illness mixed with addiction, found that under the McNaughton rule, that guy was responsible. And I'll tell you another thing. What that young woman, Rami, saw when she discovered her parents, you know, and Art has seen these too,

Stabbing murders are the worst, because it's not like TV, Megan, where somebody gets stabbed once with a knife and they fall down dead. That's what you see in the movies. In reality, they die from what's called exsanguination. That means they bleed to death, and that takes minutes, which means they are fighting, they're running around. And the rumor is, this is from multiple sources, I don't know if this is true, and we don't know the evidence yet, and of course he's presumed innocent, but the rumor is that he cut both of their throats. And when you present one of those as a prosecutor,

They said while in bed, but there's a report today saying that they were found in bed. Right, but if you go back later and you cut their throats or you slash their wrists, and I've prosecuted those too in stabbing cases, juries do not like that. It shows a calculated, cold-blooded, premeditated nature. Even if the initial contact or the initial fight is spontaneous and hot-blooded, when the killer goes back and cuts throats, that is such a...

Just a decidedly vicious move. I heard you say it yesterday on one of the commentaries. Karen Reid was one thing, but my friend Alan Jackson has his war cut out for this one. And another thing is behind the scenes, I got a bunch of friends in the L.A.D.A.'s office.

He kertovat minulle, että Nathan Hockmanin yhdessä tehtävä ryhmä on suurin piirtein. Se tulee olemaan mielenkiintoista katsoa. Se menee kokeilemaan. He eivät pysty tekemään mitään. En usko, että Hockman pystyy tekemään syrjintäpeneeltä, koska se on henkilökohtainen. Kaliforniassa syrjitään syrjintäpeneeltä, johon on murto.

But you seek, we sought it, I was on our committee for 15 years, we sought it in less than 4% of the cases that qualified. So those are the special circumstance murders, which are a small fraction of all the murders. And so I don't think you can seek death. Which they are saying this is, though. They are calling this special circumstance now. It's definitely special circumstance. Multiple murder. They say it is, but I agree, that doesn't necessarily mean that they're going to seek the death penalty. They've charged him with...

Seuraavassa keskustelussa. Minä tiedän, että te olette nyt tekemässä jotain vähäisiä. Okei, Matti, sinä olit menossa viikkoon. Kyllä, katsotaan. On todella mielenkiintoista keskustelua...

with Reiner about Charlie Kirk. And it's, you know, he's asked about that, and he's known for... With Rob Reiner, I'm sorry. I keep thinking Carl, which shows how old I am. I know. Well, I mean, there's a lineage.