Matt Walsh

teachings of the Bible in favor of grotesque misrepresentations.

They, of course, start with the conclusion that they want to draw, and then they go through the entire Bible, and they just pick the little pieces of it here and there.

Of course, not even taking into account context or what in any specific passage is meant to address in the context or what

You know, this passage is actually trying to do because you have many different types of the Bible is a is a is a compilation of many different types of writing over the course of hundreds of years.

But if you're somebody like James Tallarico, you can just pick up the Bible and just kind of flip through the pages and you find one little sentence here and one little word there and a sentence over here.

And and you just kind of stitch it together and you and you find what you're looking for.

And if you can't find it in there, well, then that's no problem because you can just throw the Bible aside and then go looking through like apocryphal texts and heretical texts and things that aren't even in the Bible and you can find what you're looking for in there.

That's what they do.

And Tallarico keeps doing it.

Watch.

Okay, so this is another ridiculous lie.

There is no debate that takes place in the Bible where a woman outwits Jesus in some kind of intellectual argument.

There is no debate in the Bible where Jesus loses the argument.

to anyone, man or woman.

There is a test of faith, which is what he's referring to, the passage he's referring to, where Jesus suggests to his disciples that a Canaanite woman, as a Gentile, wouldn't benefit from his teachings.

And the woman states that she would, in fact, benefit using a clever turn of phrase and context.

And Jesus is happy with her response.

It's a way of demonstrating that his teachings aren't just for Jews.

But

you know, to James Tallarico, this is a sign that Jesus was totally owned by the woman.