Matt Walsh

But the really obvious problem here, the thing that comes immediately to mind for everybody, is that these arguments, the arguments against releasing the congressional misconduct files, also applied to the Epstein files.

These same people, almost all of them, voted for the release of the Epstein files, even though all of the same objections applied.

It exposes victims, unsubstantiated claims, innocent people might be implicated.

All of that applies.

All of that has, in fact, happened.

I mean, all that stuff has actually happened, and they voted for it.

Three million files.

But in this case, those same objections suddenly have become more persuasive.

Hmm.

Interesting.

I wonder why.

Now, I support the release of the Epstein files.

I did support it.

I still support it.

I also support releasing these files.

And certainly, if you do one, you have to do the other.

And the point is that there is no argument for releasing the Epstein files and not this.

In fact, if anything...

If you're going to do just one, there's a more persuasive argument for only releasing the congressional files because with that, like tax money has been used to pay out settlement claims.

And so for that reason alone, you could say, well, you're using tax money for it.