Megyn Kelly

The therapist, who would typically have an ethical obligation to mention if she thought the boys had been coached by the parents, did not say that.

The prosecution was quick to point that out.

The prosecutors would, too, have an obligation to say if they thought the boys were groomed by the parents or were.

not groomed, manipulated by the parents into saying that they'd been touched when they hadn't been.

And obviously the prosecution believes these boys, but yeah, it's the timing of it.

It's not ideal.

And Dave, the reality is in a sexual abuse case like this involving children,

They're very hard to make anyway.

There's almost never a witness.

There's not a witness here.

Now the story has changed because the boys initially in the Warner Brothers investigation appear to have said that this happened when it was just Busfield in the room with them.

But they pointed out the defense did.

I didn't hear the prosecution respond to this exactly.

Yesterday they pointed out, oh, no, now it's...

The room was filled.

No, there were lots of people there, but he just managed to sort of sneak it in.

But it's like the prosecutor claimed, oh, we never said that nobody was in the room.

But the defense said, yes, they did.

And they read a transcript of the Warner Brothers investigation where they claimed initially that nobody else had been in the room.

All these contradictions undermine their credibility.