Michael Levin

You're kind of devaluing the, the, the majesty of life.

And I don't, I don't know.

I, I, the, the idea that we're now catching these patterns and, and,

were able to do meaningful research on the interfaces and all that is just, to me, absolutely beautiful.

And that it's all one spectrum, I think, to me is amazing.

I'm enriched by it.

Well, the first thing I would ask is, how much should I even be talking to?

For sure, because it's not clear to me at all that getting somebody to tell you an answer in the long run is optimal.

it's the difference between when you're a kid learning math and having an older sibling, they'll just tell you the answers, right?

Like sometimes it's just like, come on, just give me the answer.

Let's move on with this, you know, cancer protocol and whatever, like great.

But in the long run, the process of discovering it yourself, how much of that are we willing to give up?

And by getting a final answer, how much have we missed?

Of stuff we might have found along the way now I don't know what the thing is I you know I don't think it's correct to say don't do that at all you know take take the time and all the blind alleys and like that may not be optimal either but we don't know what the optimal is we don't know how much we should be stumbling around stumbling around versus having somebody tell us the answer.

That's actually a brilliant question to ask AGI then.

I mean, if it's really an AGI, I'm like, tell me what the balance is.

Like how much should I be talking to you versus stumbling around in the lab and making all my, you know, all my, my own mistakes.

It was at 70, 30, you know, 10, 90.

I don't know.

So that would be, that would be the first.