Mike Davis

on this indictment.

So I think these MSNBC people are, it's a bit of wishful thinking on their part.

And it's amazing how they've totally changed their tune on this because I remember when Democrats were indicting Trump and his top aides like you and Peter Devaro and

or at least charging you and Peter DeVaro and Jeff Clark and his supporters on January 6th and going after parents and Christians, they always said that if there's a grand jury indictment, if there are charges, it's obviously legitimate.

So by their same standard, obviously this is legitimate.

Look, it's pretty clear-cut.

Did she say on her mortgage application that her primary residence was Virginia?

And if she did, that's a clear-cut case of mortgage fraud.

It's amazing that Andrew Weissman is saying that it was an unfair process with the Comey and Big Tish indictments.

when he has no idea what the process was because it was the first step, the grand jury proceedings, and those are secret.

He has no idea if it was a fair or unfair process within the grand jury.

And he said, oh, there's not evidence for the career lawyers to move forward with these indictments.

Well, guess what?

The grand jury thought there was probable cause to move forward with these indictments because the grand jury returned true bills, both on James Comey and on Big Tish James.

And again, this is a grand jury in the eastern district of Virginia, the suburb of Chicago that is loaded up with Democrats.

government workers and illegal immigrants.

It's not the Southern District of Texas, right?

And so if this grand jury thought there was enough evidence to move forward with indictments, then there was enough evidence to move forward with indictments.

And Andrew Weissman pretends like President Trump got due process and fair trials with Tish James in New York.

No, this goofball Manhattan judge, Arthur Ingeron,