Mike Glover

One of the rounds hit him, didn't kill him, but the courts have determined, the new attorney general has determined it was a bad shoot.

And they're going to now determine whether or not criminal charges are to be brought.

So, you've seen the videos, a guy backs up into the cop, starts driving forward.

The cop draws his pistol and mag dumps the back of the vehicle.

And then he kills or he doesn't kill.

Let's say he kills the guy.

Is that a justified shooting?

Well, it depends on the perspective of the officer,

if the person was in the execution phase of conducting a felony that was going to potentially seriously injure somebody or kill somebody, including the public.

Based on his perspective, he's likely going to get away with it.

Do I think it was a good shoot?

Absolutely not, because his criteria should have been, he should have, one, seen a gun in his hand,

seen specific actions that he was going to kill somebody in order to justify him shooting that guy eight times in the back.

Now was it a murder?

No, I think it was just super negligent.

Was it an assassination?

No, I think they just don't have good enough training.

But again, the perfect recipe for disaster

is a deliberate campaign by radical extremists to elicit these type of responses, and then federal agencies buying into it by setting the conditions in the environment for this exact thing that they wanted.

Talking about the gun, bringing a gun to a protest is somehow an illegal act.