Mike Webber

They will violate any safety plan or any placement plan.

The family members will allow the offender around that child, and they won't supervise.

We've seen it time and time and time again.

This should have led to an immediate CPS removal from them and placement somewhere else.

It's apparent that her father-in-law was not going to be convinced by any evidence.

And at that point, there should have been a removal.

I faced these same issues with CPS in my state.

A lot of it is educational problems, right?

They don't have policies.

They don't know what this is.

They don't know what to do about it.

And a lot of times, even if they do, their judges won't allow them to.

So they won't pull that tube out for several months until afterwards.

That's pretty standard in every case that I've had.

The feeding tube is always going to stay in for a month or two after separation because they need to make sure that it's the correct diagnosis.

They need to make sure this child can eat.

They may need supplemental feeds while they learn to eat by mouth.

It shows doctor shopping, right?

If she doesn't get something, she goes somewhere else to get what she wants.

And did all of those hospitals report concerns?