Natalie Winters

It's like a return to tradition.

Natalie G. Winters, thank you, Steve, for having me.

Well, as a student of color revolution history, I have to say I quite enjoyed the cold open.

I don't think I've ever heard Jonathan Karl use so many euphemistic terms to try to describe the stolen election.

I guess they've gotten the memo maybe from the legal department that they should be choosing their words just a little bit more carefully.

But on that point, you're exactly right to also include in that cold open, that clip, Lisa Rubin's analysis of this forthcoming Supreme Court case.

Obviously, it impacts 16 states and Washington, D.C.,

But it's interesting, not just in tracking Mark Elias and Democracy Docket, their organization, which has been putting out nonstop the last few weeks, really sort of fearmongering about the implications or stakes of this case.

But another really important entity is, of course, the Brookings Institution.

That's where Norm Eisen used to do most of his work.

Now he's at the contrarian.

But that was always sort of ground zero for him.

really for the color revolution via what was called the democracy playbook.

I've talked about this forever.

Darren Beattie and Revolver did a lot of really seminal reporting on it, basically using the tactics that they used abroad and other countries to carry out regime change here in the United States.

And believe it or not, just a few days ago, those very same people under the auspices of the Brookings Institution as part of basically a continuation of that program just put out a new long-form report entitled, quote,

Male voting in the U.S.

data points to very low fraud and significant benefits to voters.

Now, full stop, that's a lie, and I'd like to read Norm Eisen's summary of it because it sounds like a hostage statement.

Blink if you're okay, Norm.