Nataliya Kosmyna

I don't care about that if, of course, this is what... But, you know, it's back to what are you scoring?

Are you scoring a human?

Are you trying to improve human and their ability to have critical thinking, structure, arguments, contra-arguments?

Or are you scoring an AI, an algorithm?

You know, AI doesn't need to have this scoring, right?

LM doesn't need that.

Or are you scoring...

human who uses an llm right so this is going back to i guess educational setup and we'll have a lot of questions we will need to find answers to right what are we doing what are we scoring what are we doing it for and for whom and i just think pure human to human right that's what we really need to focus but there will and there is a place for human augmented and llm obviously will be used for augmentation but there are a lot of questions there right

Please don't believe it.

I can give you one better.

I can give you one better.

Surprise, surprise.

Why is that so good, right?

Someone actually sent me yesterday from Grog, right?

Another LLM, interesting LLM, I would say, saying that apparently Natalia Kasmina is not MIT-affiliated scientist.

And I'm like, okay, that's also interesting.

Absolutely.

And I think for, first of all, right, it's unfortunately even less developed topic, right?

It's like, you know, I cannot, like, it's awful topic.

So we're going to get into this, but I cannot, I cannot like not make this awful joke.