Nataliya Kosmyna

And this level of expertise, it's unmatched.

And in all of that conversation, like segueing a bit on the side way, but all this conversation of PhD level intelligence, I'm like, yeah, sure, just...

You know, hold my glass of wine right here, just here.

I'm French, so I'm just, hold my glass of wine here.

So, you know, it's not that.

And we are very far from truly understanding the human intent because if you write for humans, it needs to be read by humans.

Like our paper, it's written by humans for humans.

And we saw how the lambs and the lamb summarizations failed miserably all the way to even summarize it.

So there's an excellent point.

Yeah, this is the thing, right?

You absolutely can give these instructions, give more soul, give a bit more of personality, all of these things.

But you have a lot of this data contamination, right?

So whatever it's going to output and throw out of you, that's old media.

It has already seen it somewhere.

It's already someone else's, right?

And we need new stuff, right?

So, and I am very open saying this, even like, you know, at institutions like me, any school, whenever I'm teaching something, you need uniqueness, right?

I want Neil's soul there.

I don't care about randomness of those outputs from an algorithm, from all around, of the stolen data, from...

from the planet, right?