Nataliya Kosmyna

interesting AI judge definitely was not able to pick up on the similarity between the students, right?

Picking up that, oh, this is, for example, Neil's writing throughout these sessions.

So just to, again, show you how important... Did you just accuse me of having soulless writing?

No, that's the point.

So the idea here, right, that human teachers, right, and their input and their intimate, really, truly intimate understanding, because, again, this is English, so for the specific task, we got the professionals, the experts.

They really knew what to look at, what to look for.

And AI, however good it is with this specific, right, because we know, like, essay writing, a lot of people have been considered experts.

Why would you even take essay writing?

This is such a useless task in 21st century 2025, right?

It still failed in some cases.

This is just to show you that limitations are there.

And some of those you cannot match, even if you think that this is an expert, it is still a generic algorithm that cannot pull this uniqueness.

And what is very important is this for students in the class, in the real classroom, right?

You want this uniqueness to shine through.

And so,

a teacher can specifically highlight that, hey, that's a great job here.

That was like a sloppy job here.

That was pretty soulless.

Who did you copy it from, from an LLM?

They even were able to recognize that.