Nate Silver

But I hadn't really thought about it. When you actually have the chance for the first time to earn a paycheck, it's kind of exciting.

But I hadn't really thought about it. When you actually have the chance for the first time to earn a paycheck, it's kind of exciting.

So Pocota, the anagram is very, I'm not going to bore your listeners for even 15 seconds. You'd be shocked with their tolerance for boredom.

So Pocota, the anagram is very, I'm not going to bore your listeners for even 15 seconds. You'd be shocked with their tolerance for boredom.

So Pocota, the anagram is very, I'm not going to bore your listeners for even 15 seconds. You'd be shocked with their tolerance for boredom.

So you might as well say it now. Picture empirical comparison. It's deliberately nerdy. An optimization test algorithm, I think.

So you might as well say it now. Picture empirical comparison. It's deliberately nerdy. An optimization test algorithm, I think.

So you might as well say it now. Picture empirical comparison. It's deliberately nerdy. An optimization test algorithm, I think.

This obscure player who was always like a thorn in the side of the tigers.

This obscure player who was always like a thorn in the side of the tigers.

This obscure player who was always like a thorn in the side of the tigers.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

I have a friend who's a neuroscientist. When he's like, yeah, our brain's just kind of just predicting and inferring. We never actually know what reality is. We're just making like an expedient internal map simulation.

I have a friend who's a neuroscientist. When he's like, yeah, our brain's just kind of just predicting and inferring. We never actually know what reality is. We're just making like an expedient internal map simulation.

I have a friend who's a neuroscientist. When he's like, yeah, our brain's just kind of just predicting and inferring. We never actually know what reality is. We're just making like an expedient internal map simulation.

It's to forecast how baseball players will do. The innovation is that most predictions will just say, okay, this player, Shohei Otani, will hit .302 with 42 home runs and 108 RBIs next year. Whereas this gave like a range of options, so it was probabilistic. And that's kind of one of my big things is we don't know the future. Baseball players get injured or stop using steroids or whatever else.

It's to forecast how baseball players will do. The innovation is that most predictions will just say, okay, this player, Shohei Otani, will hit .302 with 42 home runs and 108 RBIs next year. Whereas this gave like a range of options, so it was probabilistic. And that's kind of one of my big things is we don't know the future. Baseball players get injured or stop using steroids or whatever else.

It's to forecast how baseball players will do. The innovation is that most predictions will just say, okay, this player, Shohei Otani, will hit .302 with 42 home runs and 108 RBIs next year. Whereas this gave like a range of options, so it was probabilistic. And that's kind of one of my big things is we don't know the future. Baseball players get injured or stop using steroids or whatever else.