Ned Ryun
speaker
716 appearances
5 recordings
2 series
first heard Dec 2024
last heard 24 Dec
Ned Ryun’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Dec 2025 with 1.
Appearances
I think some of them actually believed it because they're dumb.
I mean, I couldn't give you a list of names, but... But the victims of lawfare. Yeah, I would think that he can go through and just go for the last four years or, quite frankly, eight years. Everybody that has been abused by this political lawfare, who's been abused by the DOJ and the FBI and every other aspect of our government, full pardon. And again...
go back to not just the pardons not not only do you get your freedom back and your your lives back but i hope that there's significant settlements yeah i mean i hope that these people get paid out significantly and i don't like to see more taxpayer money being sent out to people but in this situation i'm all for it yeah i am too
It is. It's unsustainable. Right. I mean, this is at some point, and I think we're coming to that. I think we have come to that point. I think we came to that point a long time ago, actually. But now it's becoming unsustainable. I mean, at one point this last, was it last year or two years ago, we were growing it by a trillion dollars.
in 100 days, every 100 days or something, the national debt, it's just, it's exploding. I think Trump thinks he can grow us out of some of these situations. I don't think that's the only, I don't think that's the solution. At some point, you have to address the underlying of what are we actually doing with this government that continues to grow, that the DNA and its DNA is perpetual growth.
Again, going back to, if you believe government, if you believe the state is salvation, and it should invade every aspect of your life. Well, until every aspect of your life is saved, government will continue to grow. You have to completely destroy this to stop the spending, to stop the growth. So I think he has to go down that dual path.
Yeah, we can, you know, growth in our economy, but at the same time, the underlying cost for the debt, the spending has been this state. And I think we have to have a conversation. This is the one thing where it feels like the American people, we never actually had a conversation with the American people about what form of government they wanted.
It was just a slow-moving regime change, I would argue, a slow-moving revolution against the Republic over the last 100 years. People are under the illusion we have some representative democracy, constitutional republic, when in fact we don't.
What is the government that we think best fits, that is best suited for a government of buy-in for the people, that provides the most amount of freedom and liberty and the most amount of prosperity for the American people? And we've really, I don't think we've really had that conversation over the last hundred years.
It's just kind of been slow moving, and all of a sudden we wake up to find ourselves in 2024, 2025 now, going... I don't think we ever had a conversation about this. Right, because the country was rich, and as long as you're rich, you don't worry about details. And the economy was growing, and life was great, and we're just going to continue on. This will never end.
But that's not how history works. That's not how... At some point, the music stops, and people have to have hard conversations about what are we actually doing to make sure that we... This is sustainable in the future because what we have is not sustainable at all on any level.
Yeah, I mean, I lobbied Trump on it.
So I was deeply concerned about, you know, people somewhere, somewhere inside of Trump world, someone was pushing Mike Rogers, which I thought was a terrible mistake. Who's Mike Rogers? Former FBI agent was running for Senate, was a member of the House. Former FBI was a member of the House. I think Intel Committee was. Then was running for Senate this time around, lost narrowly.
And then someone was pushing him to be FBI director, which I think was the wrong take by like a country mile. You don't need an institutionalist to go in and run what I think is one of the most corrupt institutions in our country today. And I told Trump, I was like, as much as you need a loyalist running DOJ, times it times a hundred running the FBI. It's a pit of vipers.
And you need somebody like Kash Patel We talked about Rick Grinnell, Kash Patel. But you need somebody that's going to go in there and be fearless to say, we are not doing this anymore. In fact, I would kind of like, I know Kash has said this. Again, we'll see what happens. But he said that day one, he'd shut it down and turn it into a museum for the deep state.
The FBI in its current form, its current iteration, needs to cease to exist. And I think Kash Patel has not only the... The intelligence and the skills, the courage. Who's going to commit terror attacks if we don't have an FBI? Yeah, I know. This to me, I think we have to, what has been the point of the FBI? They started what, 1908, I think is when they originated. What are they actually doing?
What is their purpose right now? besides being Praetorian guard for the administrative state. Right, and looking at potential people like Donald Trump as existential threats and trying to destroy them. And then we continue to fund it blindly. This is writ large with our government and administrative state.
What I find one of the most interesting things about Republicans today and have for, quite frankly, years, elect me. I'm going to go to D.C. I'm going to change D.C. They get to D.C. They accept budget recommendations from these very departmented agencies, go ahead and pass those, fund them.
do these four or 5,000 page bills, send them over to the bureaucrats who with their statutes and regulations actually put a fine point on how this is actually gonna look in reality. So they're doing the real governing. So they've not only given them all the funding without any real oversight, they just give it to them.
They've then sub-delegated their legislative authority to these unelected bureaucrats. And then go home and say, you need to send me back. I know those people at the EPA or the FDA made some terrible regulations that are ruining your lives, but send me back.
Showing 581–600 of 716 · page 30 of 36
← Previous
Next →