Ned Ryun

It has nothing to do with the Constitutional Republic. And again, it goes back to those fundamental issues I was talking about.

Donald Trump understands there are fundamental issues that have to be addressed for the good of the country now, but also for the future of the country, what we will look like as a people, what we will look like as citizens, will we be energy independent, which is a national security issue, and what form of governance will we actually have? Will we return to a republic?

Donald Trump understands there are fundamental issues that have to be addressed for the good of the country now, but also for the future of the country, what we will look like as a people, what we will look like as citizens, will we be energy independent, which is a national security issue, and what form of governance will we actually have? Will we return to a republic?

Donald Trump understands there are fundamental issues that have to be addressed for the good of the country now, but also for the future of the country, what we will look like as a people, what we will look like as citizens, will we be energy independent, which is a national security issue, and what form of governance will we actually have? Will we return to a republic?

Are we gonna continue down this administrative state path? I mean, that's the thing that I hope people did not lose in those executive orders, And dealing with obviously very current issues, but fundamental at the very basis for who we are as a people, who we are as a country, what our future looks like. And honestly, except for the TikTok thing, I couldn't be happier with what he did.

Are we gonna continue down this administrative state path? I mean, that's the thing that I hope people did not lose in those executive orders, And dealing with obviously very current issues, but fundamental at the very basis for who we are as a people, who we are as a country, what our future looks like. And honestly, except for the TikTok thing, I couldn't be happier with what he did.

Are we gonna continue down this administrative state path? I mean, that's the thing that I hope people did not lose in those executive orders, And dealing with obviously very current issues, but fundamental at the very basis for who we are as a people, who we are as a country, what our future looks like. And honestly, except for the TikTok thing, I couldn't be happier with what he did.

Yeah, American Leviathan is the birth of the administrative state and progressive authoritarianism.

Yeah, American Leviathan is the birth of the administrative state and progressive authoritarianism.

Yeah, American Leviathan is the birth of the administrative state and progressive authoritarianism.

really about the rise at the turn of the 20th century of these progressives rejecting our Constitutional Republic, rejecting and breaking apart the machinery of the Republic, which is the diffusion of power, and then building out this massive bureaucracy, administrative state filled with unelected bureaucrats, who really they viewed as a vehicle for salvation.

really about the rise at the turn of the 20th century of these progressives rejecting our Constitutional Republic, rejecting and breaking apart the machinery of the Republic, which is the diffusion of power, and then building out this massive bureaucracy, administrative state filled with unelected bureaucrats, who really they viewed as a vehicle for salvation.

really about the rise at the turn of the 20th century of these progressives rejecting our Constitutional Republic, rejecting and breaking apart the machinery of the Republic, which is the diffusion of power, and then building out this massive bureaucracy, administrative state filled with unelected bureaucrats, who really they viewed as a vehicle for salvation.

And they viewed the bureaucrats as the ones, even though they were unelected, as the ones who should be doing the actual governing, And then you find yourself in the 21st century going, why do these unelected bureaucrats think they decide? Why do they think they can take out the duly elected president of the United States?

And they viewed the bureaucrats as the ones, even though they were unelected, as the ones who should be doing the actual governing, And then you find yourself in the 21st century going, why do these unelected bureaucrats think they decide? Why do they think they can take out the duly elected president of the United States?

And they viewed the bureaucrats as the ones, even though they were unelected, as the ones who should be doing the actual governing, And then you find yourself in the 21st century going, why do these unelected bureaucrats think they decide? Why do they think they can take out the duly elected president of the United States?

And you realize this tension is between two very different governing philosophies. So I try to make it a very concise discussion. explanation of where it began, how we got here and then how we get out of it. So American Leviathan. And I appreciate the great Dan Bongino blurbing the book for me.

And you realize this tension is between two very different governing philosophies. So I try to make it a very concise discussion. explanation of where it began, how we got here and then how we get out of it. So American Leviathan. And I appreciate the great Dan Bongino blurbing the book for me.

And you realize this tension is between two very different governing philosophies. So I try to make it a very concise discussion. explanation of where it began, how we got here and then how we get out of it. So American Leviathan. And I appreciate the great Dan Bongino blurbing the book for me.

But having some conversations with current elected officials and members of Congress, it's even worse than you think, Ned. There are lots of members of Congress who think they should take, they ask these different departments and agencies, what money do you need? They take them at face value.