Ned Ryun

But having some conversations with current elected officials and members of Congress, it's even worse than you think, Ned. There are lots of members of Congress who think they should take, they ask these different departments and agencies, what money do you need? They take them at face value.

But having some conversations with current elected officials and members of Congress, it's even worse than you think, Ned. There are lots of members of Congress who think they should take, they ask these different departments and agencies, what money do you need? They take them at face value.

They think their job and responsibilities then pass through, be a pass through to give these agencies and departments whatever they want. They pass these four and 5,000 page bills that are kind of roughly frame out kind of generally what they want. They send it to these unelected bureaucrats in the article two branch where most of the administrative state resides.

They think their job and responsibilities then pass through, be a pass through to give these agencies and departments whatever they want. They pass these four and 5,000 page bills that are kind of roughly frame out kind of generally what they want. They send it to these unelected bureaucrats in the article two branch where most of the administrative state resides.

They think their job and responsibilities then pass through, be a pass through to give these agencies and departments whatever they want. They pass these four and 5,000 page bills that are kind of roughly frame out kind of generally what they want. They send it to these unelected bureaucrats in the article two branch where most of the administrative state resides.

And these bureaucrats put the fine points with statutes and regulations on these bills, and that's the actual governing. So Congress has not only capitulated in oversight because they just give them the funding that they want, they've also capitulated on the idea of legislating.

And these bureaucrats put the fine points with statutes and regulations on these bills, and that's the actual governing. So Congress has not only capitulated in oversight because they just give them the funding that they want, they've also capitulated on the idea of legislating.

And these bureaucrats put the fine points with statutes and regulations on these bills, and that's the actual governing. So Congress has not only capitulated in oversight because they just give them the funding that they want, they've also capitulated on the idea of legislating.

I mean, the Article I branch has, of their own volition over decades, given these Article II bureaucrats the right to govern this country. And I think this is, again, one of the fundamental issues where you've got to get back to there's an Article I branch, there's an Article II branch, there's an Article III branch, because the founders got something very right, Dan.

I mean, the Article I branch has, of their own volition over decades, given these Article II bureaucrats the right to govern this country. And I think this is, again, one of the fundamental issues where you've got to get back to there's an Article I branch, there's an Article II branch, there's an Article III branch, because the founders got something very right, Dan.

I mean, the Article I branch has, of their own volition over decades, given these Article II bureaucrats the right to govern this country. And I think this is, again, one of the fundamental issues where you've got to get back to there's an Article I branch, there's an Article II branch, there's an Article III branch, because the founders got something very right, Dan.

They did not trust human nature. They did not trust human nature to have consolidated power. And the whole idea was diffusion of power so that it would never be abused. And what the bureaucrats and the administrative state have been doing and trying to do for the last 100 years –

They did not trust human nature. They did not trust human nature to have consolidated power. And the whole idea was diffusion of power so that it would never be abused. And what the bureaucrats and the administrative state have been doing and trying to do for the last 100 years –

They did not trust human nature. They did not trust human nature to have consolidated power. And the whole idea was diffusion of power so that it would never be abused. And what the bureaucrats and the administrative state have been doing and trying to do for the last 100 years –

It's consolidate the legislative, executive, and judicial into one branch, into their bureaucracy to be able to do everything that they want with not a whole lot of oversight and then dictate to the American people, this is how you're going to live your lives. And that's why I say it's progressive authoritarianism.

It's consolidate the legislative, executive, and judicial into one branch, into their bureaucracy to be able to do everything that they want with not a whole lot of oversight and then dictate to the American people, this is how you're going to live your lives. And that's why I say it's progressive authoritarianism.

It's consolidate the legislative, executive, and judicial into one branch, into their bureaucracy to be able to do everything that they want with not a whole lot of oversight and then dictate to the American people, this is how you're going to live your lives. And that's why I say it's progressive authoritarianism.

Yeah, I was just going to say, you took the words out of my mouth. I mean, Donald Trump's approach to life has been, why not? Why can't I do that? Why can't we do that? Why shouldn't we be doing that? And that to me is precisely what we need at this point in our history. It's a singular moment. The man for the hour is Donald Trump.

Yeah, I was just going to say, you took the words out of my mouth. I mean, Donald Trump's approach to life has been, why not? Why can't I do that? Why can't we do that? Why shouldn't we be doing that? And that to me is precisely what we need at this point in our history. It's a singular moment. The man for the hour is Donald Trump.

Yeah, I was just going to say, you took the words out of my mouth. I mean, Donald Trump's approach to life has been, why not? Why can't I do that? Why can't we do that? Why shouldn't we be doing that? And that to me is precisely what we need at this point in our history. It's a singular moment. The man for the hour is Donald Trump.