Nick Norwitz

nine times four oh yeah no i mean when you go to like get a 16 ounce ribeye no bone that's a pound so the least he could eat was six of those per day every day the least for eight months not you know even mentioning the density of cheese and butter wow a human being can't eat this like it not not even like i don't know eddie hall or like the mountain from game of thrones probably eats this one maybe them but you can see his hands it wasn't that person so anyway

this was just one example of what i would call intellectual dishonesty in order to if i were to make the steel man what they're probably trying to do is project a a conservative and cautionary tale in order to dissuade people from doing something that people presume is harmful.

this was just one example of what i would call intellectual dishonesty in order to if i were to make the steel man what they're probably trying to do is project a a conservative and cautionary tale in order to dissuade people from doing something that people presume is harmful.

this was just one example of what i would call intellectual dishonesty in order to if i were to make the steel man what they're probably trying to do is project a a conservative and cautionary tale in order to dissuade people from doing something that people presume is harmful.

But the fact of the matter is when you have a pattern of reports like these, and there are a pattern, I can go through other examples. What ends up happening is the community of people who have benefited. That is their narrative. You're not going to dissuade them otherwise. If an individual has benefited, they feel they've benefited.

But the fact of the matter is when you have a pattern of reports like these, and there are a pattern, I can go through other examples. What ends up happening is the community of people who have benefited. That is their narrative. You're not going to dissuade them otherwise. If an individual has benefited, they feel they've benefited.

But the fact of the matter is when you have a pattern of reports like these, and there are a pattern, I can go through other examples. What ends up happening is the community of people who have benefited. That is their narrative. You're not going to dissuade them otherwise. If an individual has benefited, they feel they've benefited.

See this for what it is, intellectual dishonesty, double standards, and then trust is lost.

See this for what it is, intellectual dishonesty, double standards, and then trust is lost.

See this for what it is, intellectual dishonesty, double standards, and then trust is lost.

yeah and that is dangerous trust is lost in science and medicine so now why are they going to believe anything else that comes out of jama cardiology because this nonsense came out right and it evidently was nonsense so that's one of the top medical journals so it's not like some happened circulation too with a report where they just basically lied through their teeth and in both these instances there is no actual like good recourse so they don't accept letter to the editors i tried to do one for a circulation report they said

yeah and that is dangerous trust is lost in science and medicine so now why are they going to believe anything else that comes out of jama cardiology because this nonsense came out right and it evidently was nonsense so that's one of the top medical journals so it's not like some happened circulation too with a report where they just basically lied through their teeth and in both these instances there is no actual like good recourse so they don't accept letter to the editors i tried to do one for a circulation report they said

yeah and that is dangerous trust is lost in science and medicine so now why are they going to believe anything else that comes out of jama cardiology because this nonsense came out right and it evidently was nonsense so that's one of the top medical journals so it's not like some happened circulation too with a report where they just basically lied through their teeth and in both these instances there is no actual like good recourse so they don't accept letter to the editors i tried to do one for a circulation report they said

You know, it's a case report. You can't actually do an e-letter. I emailed the journal. I emailed the first author. No responses. I even told the first author in an email on this general cardiology report. I said, like, this report seems deficient. If you have more details, I'm willing to help support you writing in the full case report as a cautionary tale. We want a detailed dietary record.

You know, it's a case report. You can't actually do an e-letter. I emailed the journal. I emailed the first author. No responses. I even told the first author in an email on this general cardiology report. I said, like, this report seems deficient. If you have more details, I'm willing to help support you writing in the full case report as a cautionary tale. We want a detailed dietary record.

You know, it's a case report. You can't actually do an e-letter. I emailed the journal. I emailed the first author. No responses. I even told the first author in an email on this general cardiology report. I said, like, this report seems deficient. If you have more details, I'm willing to help support you writing in the full case report as a cautionary tale. We want a detailed dietary record.

If you want to get genetic testing, we can do it at my expense. I'm not against N equals one. I'm not against cautionary tales. I'm not against case reports. I'm against intellectual dishonesty. Right. And there is so much when it comes to meat and carnivore diets, and it just pervades the literature.

If you want to get genetic testing, we can do it at my expense. I'm not against N equals one. I'm not against cautionary tales. I'm not against case reports. I'm against intellectual dishonesty. Right. And there is so much when it comes to meat and carnivore diets, and it just pervades the literature.

If you want to get genetic testing, we can do it at my expense. I'm not against N equals one. I'm not against cautionary tales. I'm not against case reports. I'm against intellectual dishonesty. Right. And there is so much when it comes to meat and carnivore diets, and it just pervades the literature.

I was reading a study in neurology about red meat and dementia, and they cited a study where they said saturated fat is bad because it lowers BDNF. And the study was a mouse study where the mice were fed an HFS diet, which stands for high-fat sucrose diet. Yeah. So they were throwing saturated fat under the bus, citing mice eating sugar.