Nicolle Wallace

I want to start, though, with your first point, because I have to say, I've covered the Trump story for, I don't know, what year is it?

You know, it'll be 10 years.

Four million years.

Four million years.

And his...

fitness is this story staring us in the face that we still can't cover, right?

It's like he does something and I listen to him live.

I don't take him live very often because he lies so prolifically.

We tend to listen to him, pull out the news and then share that.

But I came up at four and he was talking to someone and I thought about taking it live.

He wasn't stringing nouns and verbs together in a way that I could even understand.

So the reason for reviewing it and playing it back is usually to field the lies.

In this instance, it was I didn't understand anything it was saying.

And I wonder why you think it's so difficult for people like us to cover his clear decline.

Well, and you can see them flirt with a different outcome, right?

You saw it when the September 2nd double strike was first reported by The Washington Post.

You had Republicans join Democrats in calling for an investigation and asking if war crimes were committed.

And then something happens...

where they try to put the genie back in the bottle, I guess, if that's what Trump is to them.

You saw it happen over Epstein with Massey and Marjorie Taylor Greene step out of line.