Nilay Patel

So you have the system now.

You have the platform and the frameworks.

As you know better than anybody, how the platforms and frameworks are built in the beginning have a pretty big effect on where they end up.

And even just talking about witness testimony, right?

Okay.

Now there's a dispute on like, did it happen before midnight or after midnight?

And you need the loading dock operator to say, actually, it was the next day.

Like this document is wrong.

It's the next day.

Did you build a system that can take witness testimony?

It's not doing that.

Does it kick that back to a human arbitrator anywhere in this system right now?

Because, I mean, that's what you would have a human arbitrator do, right?

How many cases has the system resolved so far?

There's a gap here that it just seems very striking to me.

A party that understands it needs early case evaluation because it is a repeat player in very lucrative construction disputes and they just need to keep moving and sort of the cost of the settlement is enough and they can just keep moving, that's a pretty sophisticated actor.

How do you bring all of this down to, well, most people can't even access the justice system?

Is there a path?

Yeah.

The documents only construction case, pretty constrained, right?