Nufar Gaspar

If not, just stay with your own profiling.

And then another thing that will truly unlock a lot of the goodness of AI as a writing guide or writing companion is to create detailed personas of your actual readers.

what they care about, what drives them to action, what they're skeptical of, and have these personas, a little bit similar to how I was talking about board of advisors, have those personas review the relevant draft.

So they should answer the question of, is the message clear?

Would I take action?

What's missing?

And what would make me stop reading?

If they answer all of these questions in a way that resonates with your message, by all means do that.

Otherwise, there is a lot of room for improvement.

And unlike human reviewers who get fatigued, AI gives you unlimited iterations with pointed feedback from the people who actually matter or the persona of the people who actually matter.

Those are your readers.

So definitely take advantage of that.

And the last pro tip here will be whenever you want to give an AI a feedback, don't just give it a generic feedback like, I don't like this.

I want you to score on very clear dimensions.

You decide what are the dimensions, but as an example, maybe you give it a 9 out of 10 for clarity, 5 out of 10 for wittiness, conciseness gets a 7 out of 10, and so on.

Because AI tools are very goal-driven, they are much better performing when they have clarity of how far they are from where they want to be.

And also, when you give it a feedback that is more qualitative, make it very, very concrete.

not just this is overall bad, but say what exactly don't you like.

Is it the sentence structure?

Is it the phrasing?