Owen Gregorian

And I do think in some of these cases, it seems like they wrapped up the case without doing enough digging.

And there certainly are mysteries about the Butler, Pennsylvania thing and that, you know, why wasn't there even silverware in the house?

Why was it kind of cleansed almost like someone cleaned up a crime scene?

I mean, I get it.

Um, and I'm not disputing any of that.

I think there probably is more to the story in some of these cases.

I'm just saying that when, when there is a, like at least using this as an example, when cash Patel and all these other people are saying, yes, this is definitely the guy.

We have plenty of evidence.

We know that he did it and you know, there's no question about it.

Um, and then someone else says, well, you know, that's all BS and look at all, look at my frame by frame analysis of the video and look at how it couldn't have happened that way and all that.

I mean, again, if you walk in with a bias wanting to believe one side or the other, you're probably just going to say, okay, whatever the other side is saying is, is crap.

Um, so try to keep an open mind if you are going to do that, but also at least make sure you've heard both sides.

And when I say both sides,

it's that documentary effect problem.

It's like, if you watch this frame by frame analysis and someone says there's no way Tyler Robinson was the shooter, look for someone else that deep disputes that, you know, it's kind of like what Scott did with climate change where he, you know, certainly heard all the consensus views about it and probably for a while believed it.

And then he heard all the debunks, um,

talking about the other side of that, how it's all BS.

But then he went back and forth and back and forth and back and forth and look for the debunk of the debunk of the debunk.

And there can be many layers to it like that, where, you know, if you just stop at whatever point you agree with, you may be missing part of the story.

And he admitted to it.