Parks

Yeah, Christ on a cracker. Definitely. It's also racist probably. Extremely. What the fuck is Christ on a cracker?

Yeah, Christ on a cracker. Definitely. It's also racist probably. Extremely. What the fuck is Christ on a cracker?

I think it's fair to criticize Bronny if you're doing the same scrutiny to other players in the G League or whatever developmental situation he's playing under, which they're not.

I think it's fair to criticize Bronny if you're doing the same scrutiny to other players in the G League or whatever developmental situation he's playing under, which they're not.

I think it's fair to criticize Bronny if you're doing the same scrutiny to other players in the G League or whatever developmental situation he's playing under, which they're not.

See, I think you could critique the kid. You could critique it. But I think that it should be fair. It goes even to what Chuck was saying about ESPN without saying it was about ESPN. I don't know if you saw that last night. He went on a little rant about how they cover nothing but the Lakers and the Warriors when there's the Cavs and OKC doing great, and they don't ever cover them, which I agree.

See, I think you could critique the kid. You could critique it. But I think that it should be fair. It goes even to what Chuck was saying about ESPN without saying it was about ESPN. I don't know if you saw that last night. He went on a little rant about how they cover nothing but the Lakers and the Warriors when there's the Cavs and OKC doing great, and they don't ever cover them, which I agree.

See, I think you could critique the kid. You could critique it. But I think that it should be fair. It goes even to what Chuck was saying about ESPN without saying it was about ESPN. I don't know if you saw that last night. He went on a little rant about how they cover nothing but the Lakers and the Warriors when there's the Cavs and OKC doing great, and they don't ever cover them, which I agree.

That's been my criticism of ESPN for a minute, at least in terms of NFL. We're talking about the Patriots and the Cowboys. Who gives a fuck? They're not relevant. So I think that same thing can be applied here. If he's not relevant or playing in a relevant role, why are we covering it? This is still business. That's why we're covering it. Nah, stop.

That's been my criticism of ESPN for a minute, at least in terms of NFL. We're talking about the Patriots and the Cowboys. Who gives a fuck? They're not relevant. So I think that same thing can be applied here. If he's not relevant or playing in a relevant role, why are we covering it? This is still business. That's why we're covering it. Nah, stop.

That's been my criticism of ESPN for a minute, at least in terms of NFL. We're talking about the Patriots and the Cowboys. Who gives a fuck? They're not relevant. So I think that same thing can be applied here. If he's not relevant or playing in a relevant role, why are we covering it? This is still business. That's why we're covering it. Nah, stop.

I think that's the problem. I think that Stephen A. in particular is compelling and talented enough to make great storylines about anything else. He's great.

I think that's the problem. I think that Stephen A. in particular is compelling and talented enough to make great storylines about anything else. He's great.

I think that's the problem. I think that Stephen A. in particular is compelling and talented enough to make great storylines about anything else. He's great.

But this works.

But this works.

But this works.

That's just totally different. What's the difference?

That's just totally different. What's the difference?

That's just totally different. What's the difference?