Paul Morrow

So, Kayleigh, I want to come to you as the lawyer on the panel, aside from me, but I'm asking the questions.

So let me ask you, do they put themselves in a legal box here?

Because if they go after somebody like a corporation subsequent to the administration, if I'm sitting where the corporation is, I point to this and say, this is predatory.

It has nothing to do with real law.

You're just coming after me for political purposes, undermining their case.

What do you think?

Absolutely.

You never want to make statements about someone you're going to potentially prosecute.

They can claim malicious prosecution as a defense.

We have seen these arguments through the Trump administration, actually.

So it's not something that I would advise from a legal standpoint.

I do want to take us back to memory lane where this all began.

You know, retribution.

I'm sure Jessica will talk to retribution in the Trump administration.

That's the predictable points from the left.

But the impetus for retribution came far before Trump.

It came during Trump won.

It came with the Russia hoax that went on and on and on.

It came with the impeachment over a perfect phone call, just the willy nilly impeachment of a president, something we had not seen previously.

And it came this headline that that never gets any coverage.