Paul Saladino, MD

Oh, in the control group, we're going to say eat your normal diet, which is perhaps animal fat rich, but you're probably also eating margarine with trans fats because we didn't tell you to stop doing that. And the experimental group, we're going to say eat more seed oils, but also exercise more, eat more vegetables and stop smoking.

Oh, in the control group, we're going to say eat your normal diet, which is perhaps animal fat rich, but you're probably also eating margarine with trans fats because we didn't tell you to stop doing that. And the experimental group, we're going to say eat more seed oils, but also exercise more, eat more vegetables and stop smoking.

Oh, in the control group, we're going to say eat your normal diet, which is perhaps animal fat rich, but you're probably also eating margarine with trans fats because we didn't tell you to stop doing that. And the experimental group, we're going to say eat more seed oils, but also exercise more, eat more vegetables and stop smoking.

And these are the type of randomized controlled trials that form the, quote, bedrock of the fact checkers. When I get fact check on. Instagram or Meta, any Meta platform for saying that seed oils are harmful for humans.

And these are the type of randomized controlled trials that form the, quote, bedrock of the fact checkers. When I get fact check on. Instagram or Meta, any Meta platform for saying that seed oils are harmful for humans.

And these are the type of randomized controlled trials that form the, quote, bedrock of the fact checkers. When I get fact check on. Instagram or Meta, any Meta platform for saying that seed oils are harmful for humans.

They'll say, no, there's a randomized controlled trial here, or there's a meta analysis here, or here's an AFP fact check article where people have said seed oils are fine based on these foundationally, fundamentally flawed randomized controlled trials. And the randomized controlled trials that show seed oils to be harmful are suppressed.

They'll say, no, there's a randomized controlled trial here, or there's a meta analysis here, or here's an AFP fact check article where people have said seed oils are fine based on these foundationally, fundamentally flawed randomized controlled trials. And the randomized controlled trials that show seed oils to be harmful are suppressed.

They'll say, no, there's a randomized controlled trial here, or there's a meta analysis here, or here's an AFP fact check article where people have said seed oils are fine based on these foundationally, fundamentally flawed randomized controlled trials. And the randomized controlled trials that show seed oils to be harmful are suppressed.

Sydney Diet Heart, Minnesota Coronary Experiment at the Rose Corn Oil Trial was one of the first trials done on seed oils in the late 1950s. And it was underpowered, but it clearly showed that seed oils were very harmful for humans. A significantly higher amount of people in the seed oil group versus the saturated fat group had heart attacks. And the p-value was between 0.05 and 0.1.

Sydney Diet Heart, Minnesota Coronary Experiment at the Rose Corn Oil Trial was one of the first trials done on seed oils in the late 1950s. And it was underpowered, but it clearly showed that seed oils were very harmful for humans. A significantly higher amount of people in the seed oil group versus the saturated fat group had heart attacks. And the p-value was between 0.05 and 0.1.

Sydney Diet Heart, Minnesota Coronary Experiment at the Rose Corn Oil Trial was one of the first trials done on seed oils in the late 1950s. And it was underpowered, but it clearly showed that seed oils were very harmful for humans. A significantly higher amount of people in the seed oil group versus the saturated fat group had heart attacks. And the p-value was between 0.05 and 0.1.

So there was less than a one in a thousand chance that this result showing seed oils are harmful happens by chance. Less than one in a thousand. But because the p-value wasn't less than 0.05, people say it wasn't a significant finding. That should have been case closed for seed oils in the 1950s.

So there was less than a one in a thousand chance that this result showing seed oils are harmful happens by chance. Less than one in a thousand. But because the p-value wasn't less than 0.05, people say it wasn't a significant finding. That should have been case closed for seed oils in the 1950s.

So there was less than a one in a thousand chance that this result showing seed oils are harmful happens by chance. Less than one in a thousand. But because the p-value wasn't less than 0.05, people say it wasn't a significant finding. That should have been case closed for seed oils in the 1950s.

there were still 10 more randomized controlled trials that many of which almost funded by the food industry funded by the food industry or which confused the data, which are very complex trials. And there isn't a perfect trial done with seed oils, but I would argue that the best trials with seed oils clearly show they're harmful. It's just that these trials have been suppressed.

there were still 10 more randomized controlled trials that many of which almost funded by the food industry funded by the food industry or which confused the data, which are very complex trials. And there isn't a perfect trial done with seed oils, but I would argue that the best trials with seed oils clearly show they're harmful. It's just that these trials have been suppressed.

there were still 10 more randomized controlled trials that many of which almost funded by the food industry funded by the food industry or which confused the data, which are very complex trials. And there isn't a perfect trial done with seed oils, but I would argue that the best trials with seed oils clearly show they're harmful. It's just that these trials have been suppressed.

And as you know, with a meta analysis, a researcher like Darius Mazzafari and at Tufts who gifted us with the food compass system, which tells us that Fruit Loops and Cheerios are healthier than ground beef and eggs. can write a meta-analysis on seed oils, and he's done this, and he can leave out things like Sydney Diet Heart.

And as you know, with a meta analysis, a researcher like Darius Mazzafari and at Tufts who gifted us with the food compass system, which tells us that Fruit Loops and Cheerios are healthier than ground beef and eggs. can write a meta-analysis on seed oils, and he's done this, and he can leave out things like Sydney Diet Heart.