Pete Hegseth

For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to charliekirk.com.

I'm straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles. It hasn't made us more effective, hasn't made us more lethal, has made fighting more complicated.

I'm straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles. It hasn't made us more effective, hasn't made us more lethal, has made fighting more complicated.

I'm straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles. It hasn't made us more effective, hasn't made us more lethal, has made fighting more complicated.

They're going to start to return back, I would think, for many of them, to what they really were supposed to be doing in the first place. Oh, the incentive is having more ammo and more training, not more diversity trainings? How about we do that? I do think it's the type of institution that can turn differently than, say, a Department of Education, which we should just get rid of completely.

They're going to start to return back, I would think, for many of them, to what they really were supposed to be doing in the first place. Oh, the incentive is having more ammo and more training, not more diversity trainings? How about we do that? I do think it's the type of institution that can turn differently than, say, a Department of Education, which we should just get rid of completely.

They're going to start to return back, I would think, for many of them, to what they really were supposed to be doing in the first place. Oh, the incentive is having more ammo and more training, not more diversity trainings? How about we do that? I do think it's the type of institution that can turn differently than, say, a Department of Education, which we should just get rid of completely.

Or if you weren't going to get rid of, you couldn't pull the roots out fast enough or hard enough. Because I think the core of that Pentagon would be with all of those moves. Most of your 06s and 07s and 05s and E7s and E8s who fought these wars and saw the nonsense and people serve with people who were killed will say, yeah, yeah, let's get back to the real right now. And they would do it.

Or if you weren't going to get rid of, you couldn't pull the roots out fast enough or hard enough. Because I think the core of that Pentagon would be with all of those moves. Most of your 06s and 07s and 05s and E7s and E8s who fought these wars and saw the nonsense and people serve with people who were killed will say, yeah, yeah, let's get back to the real right now. And they would do it.

Or if you weren't going to get rid of, you couldn't pull the roots out fast enough or hard enough. Because I think the core of that Pentagon would be with all of those moves. Most of your 06s and 07s and 05s and E7s and E8s who fought these wars and saw the nonsense and people serve with people who were killed will say, yeah, yeah, let's get back to the real right now. And they would do it.

And then you switch the military academies and you say, we're not teaching DEI anymore. And then more importantly, I think you go back to standards across the military and say, whatever the standards were in 1996, those are the standards. You know, like whatever it took to pass ranger school or airborne school or become a Marine or whatever. I mean, I just and that doesn't mean going backwards.

And then you switch the military academies and you say, we're not teaching DEI anymore. And then more importantly, I think you go back to standards across the military and say, whatever the standards were in 1996, those are the standards. You know, like whatever it took to pass ranger school or airborne school or become a Marine or whatever. I mean, I just and that doesn't mean going backwards.

And then you switch the military academies and you say, we're not teaching DEI anymore. And then more importantly, I think you go back to standards across the military and say, whatever the standards were in 1996, those are the standards. You know, like whatever it took to pass ranger school or airborne school or become a Marine or whatever. I mean, I just and that doesn't mean going backwards.

It means returning to colorblind standards, returning to gender affirming or gender recognizing standards, to use the wrong phrase. Men and women are different. There's a whole chapter on that. You know, one of the examples I use in the book is the Marine Corps. When Obama wanted to push women in combat, the Marine Corps did a study.

It means returning to colorblind standards, returning to gender affirming or gender recognizing standards, to use the wrong phrase. Men and women are different. There's a whole chapter on that. You know, one of the examples I use in the book is the Marine Corps. When Obama wanted to push women in combat, the Marine Corps did a study.

It means returning to colorblind standards, returning to gender affirming or gender recognizing standards, to use the wrong phrase. Men and women are different. There's a whole chapter on that. You know, one of the examples I use in the book is the Marine Corps. When Obama wanted to push women in combat, the Marine Corps did a study.

And this study was, let's test 400 male Marines versus 300 male Marines and 100 female Marines together in a grueling exercise of tests. And shocker, the 400 male Marines crushed the whole thing. And this was a 300 and 100, not a 200, 200. I mean, this is, and what did Ray Mavis, the Secretary of the Navy, do? I don't know.

And this study was, let's test 400 male Marines versus 300 male Marines and 100 female Marines together in a grueling exercise of tests. And shocker, the 400 male Marines crushed the whole thing. And this was a 300 and 100, not a 200, 200. I mean, this is, and what did Ray Mavis, the Secretary of the Navy, do? I don't know.

And this study was, let's test 400 male Marines versus 300 male Marines and 100 female Marines together in a grueling exercise of tests. And shocker, the 400 male Marines crushed the whole thing. And this was a 300 and 100, not a 200, 200. I mean, this is, and what did Ray Mavis, the Secretary of the Navy, do? I don't know.

You know, throw the study out because it's not what the political folks wanted, even though they were told if you do a study and it shows differences. Whoever was involved in any of those types of things, you can see the door and you'll be replaced by a junior officer who can be promoted more quickly.